CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Machiavelli1

Reward Points:34
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
85%
Arguments:8
Debates:14
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
8 most recent arguments.

What are you going to do about an education? You are too old for school. You missed your opportunity to be smart, and now you've got to live with the consequences.

Somewhere a little violin plays sad songs for you.

Red herring fallacy. You never answered the easy question you were asked. It was a simple question.

Red herring is a kind of fallacy that is an irrelevant topic introduced in an argument to divert the attention of listeners or readers from the original issue.

https://literarydevices.net/red-herring/

Something can feel good for a moment, a day, a week, a month, or even a year, and then hit you years later as unacceptable or wrong.

Good thing the press isn't running for office.. They're NOT especially popular. And, that's ON PURPOSE.. It's NOT their job to be liked. It's NOT their job to unite us.. It's NOT their job to be popular.

What we know for sure is that they don't see it as their job to investigate or be curious about the left.

Machiavelli1(34) Clarified
1 point

It is a bit of a mess, isn't it?? But, you're talking about a management problem, and with proper management, those problems can be solved.. Oh, I'm not saying that changes will have to be made.. They will. But, if we have leaders who are actually LEADING, those changes will happen..

As in record low unemployment for minorities or tax cuts that brought in more revenue than the proposed taxes?

3 points

I've never seen an American football game, but it looked rather wild.

I'm not butthurt. Social media isn't required to treat conservatives as equals or apply social justice equally. Just pointing out why we don't take liberals seriously. Can players kneel? Yes. Can their employer censor them just like facebook does conservatives? Yes. Do I care either way? No. Free speech only means the government cannot censor speech. The same rule does not apply to social media or football games according to the Constitution. All I see the kneeling doing is piss off people, divide the country, & cause the NFL's ratings & capital to tank. It may feel like something, but in the real world, who is winning in that scenario?

To say it's "more American" to kneel isn't coherant in logic. It may feel nice to say something like that, but if the Chinese military were to invade us and kneel to protest the flag, it would not make them more "American". It would make them America hating Communists. True or false?

0 points

Conservatives would probably take Democrats more seriously on the issue if they weren't being shadow banned on every social network platform, & were not aware of the left's Alinskyism.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here