CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Mack

Reward Points:329
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
92%
Arguments:396
Debates:16
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
2 points

A good debater is honest with both their opponent and themselves.

1 point

In my opinion, to be responsible for someone's death you must have caused it, and in this case the person refusing to help did not cause the death. I'm not saying that makes it okay not to help, it's just that the person not helping would be guilty of something else, that is, being an asshole.

I never said or implied that I wouldn't help a drowning person.

3 points

(Disclaimer; I'm not a vegan)

Hitler also drank water and breathed air. Better stop doing those things too.............................................

1 point

It is very helpful for people on the fence and for people who want to develop their understanding of the sorts of topics debated about. Most of the topics suck but a few interesting ones pop up every now and then. I wouldn't say it touches many, but I'll be happy if I've just convinced one person to agree with me, or have had my opinion swayed, as it has been before.

3 points

Sure; what of the child is about to kill two other children or something and you have no choice but to shoot them? I'm thinking about that scene in the movie American sniper.

5 points

Hmmmm... The article linked above states that atheism and agnosticism are dying out but proceeds to say that their numbers are increasing, and only their share (a percentage) of the worldwide population is decreasing. That's self-contradictory.

Also, it explains that the portion of religious people is increasing mainly because of huge growth rates in Africa ("The huge growth rate will be among Christians in Africa"), while stating that their portion is decreasing in western countries ("While the numbers of those who are “religiously unaffiliated” is predicted to rise in Western Europe and the United States").

In other words, the portion of religious people is increasing because there are high birth rates in less civilized countries, not because science points to God as you infer.

Another reason suggested for why religiously unaffiliated people's portion is decreasing is "mainly because individuals in this group are older and have less children." Again, not because science points to God as you claim.

Mack(329) Clarified
2 points

"Free speech certainly doesn't exist on this site. Express a view which is at odds with the looney left's agenda and the post is downvoted into oblivion."

I disagree with these two lines, as the downvoting doesn't in any way silence these views, meaning their freedom of speech remains intact. Sure it pushes their arguments to the bottom of the page, but it's pretty easy to scroll down. I don't see people's arguments being removed by the site's owner, and I don't see the banning function being abused very much. People have the freedom to downvote as much as they like.

I agree with the rest of your argument though.

1 point

Why is it wring to kill a newborn?????????????????????????????????????????????

1 point

I didn't realize anybody thought either was racist. Black people refer to themselves as black and white people refer to themselves as white. I could see yellow for Asians being considered racist though.

1 point

i can't speak for black in the U.S, but I know that in NZ, Maoris (indigenous people) (and other pacific islanders) are given seemingly unfair advantages, e.g, they have preferential (guaranteed) entry into university even with terrible grades, along with access to more scholarships. I have friends who are Maori who barely have to pay for university (mind you it is pretty cheap here anyways), even though they haven't done anything better than I have, and don't have any greater financial need than me. They agree that this is unfair, but I can't blame them for taking the money. If you have good grades and are Maori (like my friends) you're set through high-school and university. There are also truckloads of special clubs and things, but that doesn't bother me as I wouldn't want to join them even if I were Maori.

The purpose of these advantages as far as I can tell is to reduce poverty levels among Maori, but I don't see why these advantages can't just be for poor people rather than Maori.

That being said I wouldn't say it is a tremendous asset, but it is useful.

It also seems unfair to have quotas for certain racial groups in some employment (which I think we have).

Displaying 10 most recent debates.

Tied Positions: No, because... vs. Yes, because...
Winning Position: What do you regret the most?
Tied Positions: No, because... vs. Yes, because...
Winning Position: Yes, because...
Winning Position: Is a human life any more valuable than animal life, and why?

About Me


"I like to think about stuff, and that's about it."

Biographical Information
Gender: Chap
Age: 17
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Other
Country: New Zealand
Religion: Atheist
Education: High School

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here