CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Mosadegh

Reward Points:14
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:9
Debates:1
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
9 most recent arguments.
1 point

Not directly. Assuming that you could have helped in any way then that includes running or calling help. Now because they could live or die even if willing help came you didn’t kill them but the intent could considered be malicious. So you put their life at risk with malicious intent. Not murder but jail time for sure

1 point

The motivation behind public execution is a callback to previous times where people saw the brutal, justified (sometimes) execution of their enemies themselves. The punishment is more “real”. There would be a trial still. If someone did it for attention that can be determined

1 point

The point is the people who have committed said atrocious crimes are not, in fact better than that. Should someone commit a crime like that, say rape for example, the punishment would serve as no deterrent. It would a punishment based upon the individual as a form of revenge, to gratify society of the crime they have committed. And frankly, we as a society are barely better than anything, as our nature clearly shows

1 point

This is right. The point of an economic system is to sevre whoever controls it

2 points

Good thought. I would say that this would have an emotional effect in the sentencing but legally no, only one person died

1 point

Regardless of ones beliefs or who the child is, say “yes” and that they are going to it. A child should not die in fear and they are gullible so they will believe you. That’s all you can really say. A user did bring up that you could ask what they thought which I reckon is a acceptable alternative too

1 point

Good thought! I like how you play to what the child thinks to make them feel better and not give them a yes or no

1 point

Disconnected and spiteful argument rather than an intelligent one. Make more sense and don’t depend on petty personal attacks.

2 points

Most poor people are too old or sick to work. They have no point at which to start of getting a job or being able to reliably save money. Hundreds if not thousands of dollars are needed to just get a job at mcdonalds. Seems crazy? You have good clothes, a home, a car and no other worries that matter here besides getting that job. They don’t. Most places try to hire young people too, most homeless are older. Negative views towards homeless also serve to hinder employment as well as transportation. Getting back to the discussion, when homeless are able to save any real money (which is rare) they usually have lost hope and use it on the pleasures of life. Who can blame them?

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here