Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 15 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 93% |
Arguments: | 15 |
Debates: | 0 |
Sorry, you are the one who is wrong. I did understand the course, and there was plenty of other material referenced in the book that I referred to. But apparently, you don't like back up referencing unless it agrees with your point of view. Too bad for you.
I understand the principle of proportionality very well, actually, I suggest you are the one who needs to read up on it.
No, I mean that I read the book that was the reading material for a 2nd year politics course, passed with above average marks, and agree with the author, his opinion, his book and his arguments.
I have explained why the principle of proportionality was met. It's not hard to understand that this action from America did actually save thousands of lives. That is what the principle of proportionality is about.
No. I do not believe in the factuality of the Illuminati/ The New World Order because of the low calibre of the people who talk about it as a negative thing. From what I have read, the people who talk about this movement and its conspiracy are fundamentalist Christians who speak in tongues and believe in the subjugation of women. I do not find them, or much of what they say, credible in the least.
|