- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
No, they weren't. You claimed that the Democratic party tried to organize a sort of internal coup in the Catholic Church. The only evidence you have shown has him explicitly stating the opposite. Redirecting me to the same argument does not disprove the claim that, again, rested upon that evidence. That's beyond circular.
....sexual attraction is a feeling. It is THE feeling we are talking about. You have consistently claimed that the feeling (sexual orientation) is a choice, as you did in this very post. You also continuously insist on conflating feelings of sexual attraction (what this debate is about) with sexual acts (which this debate isn't about).
Please, seriously, enough talking about sexual acts. This debate isn't about that. It's about whether or not an individual chooses who they are attracted to. That's it.
And I have asked you several times to provide a real definition of the word homosexual that implies sexual acts. Can you, or can you not, provide one?
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!