CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS NeoMakazo

Reward Points:31
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
88%
Arguments:4
Debates:6
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
4 most recent arguments.
1 point

I don't agree with these sayings. For one you are sending links to websites, not using literate terms directly from the bibles. B, who's to say god actually exists, and if he did, he's the creator of everything, but how did he come in to existence? Lastly, the bible strictly quotes, JAMES 4:12 "12 There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the one who is able to save and destroy. But you—who are you to judge your neighbor?"

NeoMakazo(31) Clarified
1 point

I agree, humans have a 7% use of their brains' full potential, as dolphins are actually at 20%. Not entirely sure about what they meant about humans being ugly, maybe mindset?

NeoMakazo(31) Clarified
1 point

By unchallenged I mean not changing. And by everything i said everything possible. Sorry I didn't clarify on that sooner, i meant the way they act in situations. Like a lot of people when nervous will scrunch up and their will shake.

3 points

Though i agree on both sides, people in person will often judge someone before the 5 minute period you can study them during conversation. What i mean by this is when you see someone new and engage in conversation, first impression on the topic decides subconsciously how they supposedly think there as leading to a misconception that you should, or should not trust them. Several key points I would like to explain would be the idea in which if only social media relations existed, how would people be quick to understand what someone may be like considering you cannot see them at a large factor. This also combats the social idea, without seeing them, you may happen across an exceptional manipulator, not the proper term though that's beside the given point. Either way, you're bound to misjudge someone, though looks are an extreme illusion in modern society because we were raised that people with horrid intentions dress and act mischievously, though in actuality, most of those people blend in perfectly in looks, I personally would rather use proxy and meet online than meet in person and risk them knowing far more about me and the way i think and react to every situation. I would love to understand all points of view so please, consider both points I've made and make your own conclusion.

Displaying 6 most recent debates.

Tied Positions: Reverse Evolution vs. Particle Accelerator
Winning Position: If your most loved person was diagnosed with schizophrenia, you would..?
Winning Position: What is the one thing you would want to change about the earth? Why?
Winning Position: Yes
Winning Position: Humans have no unique feature other than looks. Change my mind.
Winning Position: What is your personal input on how the mind may function in Different situations?

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here