Obama doesn't know everything about he economy, but he knows a lot. He also has advisors, including the man who should be the head of the federal reserve, helping to aid him in policy making.

You can't condem an entire ideal based on mistakes made 80 years ago. What you can do, is learn from those mistakes, and apply new ideas and logic to new problems.

"Unless I had to eat it to survive."

so then, yes, you would eat human.

I sense this is not going to be a productive conversation...

He knows everything, and there ist any other way.

I read the whole thing. You said that you say nigger, but not here on CD. But you do say fag here on CD.

And, luckily, I don't know you outside of this website.

And fag has meant "gay" as a negative very recently. Many people still use or view it as having that definition.

You can have the opinion tht South Park is meaningful, but that is your opinion, not mine, certainly not the entire world's.

It's my opinion that useing those hateful slurs, no matter how you mean them, is insensitive and rude.

There has never been a time when two armies just met in a field and battled it out. Every war has seeped into the walls of cities and homes of civilians in the area where the war is being fought.

I can understand the effect that bombing Japan had on the overall outcome of the war. However, I don't believe that bombing two areas was at all necessary.

There always have, and always will be wars and civilian casualties. But it is my opinion that such mass murder is unjustifiable.

So you will say "fag" but not "nigger"? Why is that?

Because fag has meant many things, instead of just it's one most recent and most negative definition?

Yes, words are constantly being redefined and reapplied. But there are many people who still use the word in the same way many people still use the word "nigger" negatively towards African Americans.

Given time, the word "fag" may grow to mean something other than a negative slur for gay, but as of now, it still carries that meaning.

Unless you live in the cartoon town of South Park, Colorado.

They are both bad, Joe. They mean the same thing, and they can both be taken negatively by a considerable amount of people.

Well, yes, it is unrealistic. I actually would not be able to kill someone to eat him or her. The "right circumstances" for me would have to be preceeded by a more natural death.

I would also consider trying human meat from a cadaver who was killed by something other than disease. I know that sounds creepy, but to me, meat is meat and when humans die were nothing but potential nutrients.

So, you would starve to death before eating an animal, let alone a human?