Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 8 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 4 |
Debates: | 1 |
Size matters in some circumstances but if you have a choice I think that people should at least be a moderate thin size and that does not mean being smaller than paper or air
Reasons for this is because when you're bigger you have more problems with your health like high blood pressure higher sodium levels and high suger which being big doesn't make you have diabetes but it makes you have a bigger chance and when you do get it if you do your body won't have enough energy to fight the disease because the lack of exercise and also the amount of energy it takes to support the persons weight an also if they have to ever get surgery the doctors would have to go through so many layers of body fat which is dangerous and can cause death even to a very treatable disease
But that's why I prefer that people need to be thin rather than thick.
No guns don't kill people , people kill people
And saying gun kill people is saying that people don't toast , toast but that toast,toast,toast
Once after this debate went major I set out a gun with it loaded setting it in a lawn chair right beside me in my front yard and numerous people went by like the mailman guys on motorcycles and little girls playing and despite all the chances the gun had to shot someone about one thousand times that day and it never happened but then I went hunting found a nice deer and then I yes I shot the deer and it died by who me
Have you ever noticed that guns never get credit for killing but the person does ? That's because the person kills the person shots not the gun unless there like the toy story characters and walk around when I'm not looking which I highly doubt so people kill people and people toasts toast
There is so many factors that either side would win.
Like how America have better trained troops
And a little more money to spend for the war
But America really haven't been showing the skills they should be and could be and I see this all over these arguments that America have never lost and who could beat America?
If you have any knowledge of American war history we have lost numerous wars so America isn't the best war fighting country even though thy could be
Also something else people take for granted is that America is bigger so they would magically win but look at Japan they're small but have a considerable good country so size doesn't matter and know one knows how North Korea trains there army and they've been waiting to attack America even past the fifties and North Korea could over power them because as everyone knows size doesn't matter
There are way more things I could say but this should be enough to make you think twice about your argument.
I would say china... They have army about one billion five hundred million so that is way more than america have population so also if we did even stand a chance America would have to kill about 250 people each... So Chinese would have the leg up
And if china helped North Korea in a war America would lose ... Not fast as if it was nk vs us it wouldn't take horrible long for America to win but that's about it.
|