- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Will militias “waiting” on standing armies at the border even be beneficial? Or will it just create more chaos? Standing armies are likely to be more reliable than just regular militias as they have more proper training- rather than a bunch of rag-tag citizens banding together against a cause most of them may be uneducated on.
Factions are the big issue. It is easy for factions to rely on their own bias, or to follow the leader in terms of ideas and ways things are run. This gives factions the chance to shift the agenda to benefit only their interests, instead of the interests of everyone. This can be supported with the quote- “By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.”
The necessary and proper clause is important. Passing the necessary and proper clause gives congress the right to do what is in the best interest of everyone. The necessary and proper clause doesn’t give the government any more authority than they already have, and is practically a given power. Hamilton shows this when he says, “They are only declaratory of a truth which would have resulted by necessary and unavoidable implication from the very act of constituting a federal government, and vesting it with certain specified powers.”
Our governments are too unreliable. The government is practically run by the majority, which gives no room for other voices to speak up. The democratic ways of our government causes us to stray away from justice, and steer towards the needs of those in the majority, leading to private rights being wrongfully violated. This can be supported with the quote- “...and particularly, for that prevailing and increasing distrust of public engagements….these must be chiefly, if not wholly, effects of the unsteadiness and injustice, with which a factious spirit has tainted our public administration.”
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!