- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
If morality did not exist, then there would be no concept of what is good or evil. It would come down to what is beneficial to a person( or community) and what is not. Without the boundaries that morality imposes, arguments against evil things such as racism and genocide become harder to fight. From a purely scientific point, those ideas suddenly become more viable. Racism allows a population to protect itself from foreign pathogens and disease by secluding themselves from what they perceive as a threat. Genocide would allow for a community to guarantee that its genes survive. I understand that these evil actions still occur today, but because of morality, we are able to fight them and try to eliminate them from society.
I do not think there should be an overall free health care system. That being said, everyone should have access to free emergency health care when life, limb or eyesight is in immediate danger. As for overall health care, I think the workplace should provide healthcare depending on the risk of said job. So people working in jobs where accidents/deaths occur more frequently will have to provide their employees with a different level of healthcare then jobs.
Yes because they do not understand the founding fathers original purpose behind the second amendment. As Thomas Jefferson himself said "And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.... The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants." (Thomas Jefferson in a letter to William S. Smith in 1787). Scary guns ,as you put it, are the ones that can keep a government in line. Without them, a time could come where the government can simply use the military to force the people to its will. Our founding fathers were terrified of a standing military being used against the people so they put the second amendment in place. Regarding the preamble "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State" , it says nothing about a militia that is controlled by government, be it a state or federal one. It is meant as a militia formed by the people. Democrats now only see guns as just used for hunting, home protection, or even killing people, but they forgot they most important role in our society, and that it is to prevent tyranny.
Terrorism is a tool used by people to force their views on a larger population. Usually the people or groups that use terrorism do not have the capabilities to force their views through conventional means like all out war or popular vote like in democracy. Today, mainly through the media, the only terrorism we really see is the one the is driven by Islamic fundamentalist. Yet in the 1971, in the US the Weather Underground bombed the US Capitol building and they were a far left socialist/communist group. Groups like the Animal Liberation Front are also nonreligious yet have committed acts of terror. Terrorism is just a tool, like a gun, it all depends on who is wielding it, whether it is religious or not.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!