CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS ScarySkeptic

Reward Points:4
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:9
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
9 most recent arguments.
1 point

Ray Comfort's banana argument. Without a doubt! The only way I could explain it is; banana good for man, so banana made for man!

1 point

To claim that a lack of religion based on evidence, reasoning and science is in itself a religion is absurd. atheists don't rely on faith to tell us about a magic man in the sky. We rely on our own brains.

1 point

That's an ad hominem fallacy. You're attacking the arguer instead of the argument.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

1 point

Doesn't saying "Taking a moral position does not necessarily mean taking a religious position" completely go against the argument?

2 points

We don't need a universally objective moral standard, just a personal one. One that most people fundamentally have. A moral standard based on empathy and human decency. The idea that without objective morality, we'd all be inherently monstrous is completely wrong.

1 point

You're assuming that everybody follows a single ideology, which is completely untrue! You realize that Germans during the Nazi regime weren't all genocidal anti-Semitics. A minority simply manipulated decent people to get into power. Not everybody followed the Nazi ideology, ergo your premise is inherently flawed.

1 point

By your own personal moral compass! You work it out for yourself! If we only act morally because some magic man in the sky is watching us, that's not morality at all! That's a false sense of morality created through fear!

1 point

If God is omniscient and omnipotent as he is claimed to be, these laws mean nothing. From a classically theistic view, there's no reason he couldn't design a human without the need to obey the biological laws that HE put into place. To claim that an omniscient God is restricted by his own biological laws is frankly nonsense.

1 point

Cars pass gas because when they were designed, we had no other way of powering them. It's ridiculous to claim that a supposedly omniscient and omnipotent God would beer physically unable to avoid this.

ScarySkeptic has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here