CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS SidRonCon

Reward Points:5
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:5
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
5 most recent arguments.
2 points

The way to argue this would not be to see whether a man or a woman is a better leader or which of the two are more capable. We need to focus on the scenario of the current world and come to a conclusion. Regardless of when or where this debate is to be situated in, men are the ones with more and better jobs than women. This only proves that men have more working experience and that they come across a lot of important decisions at work that make them better decision-makers. The skills learnt at office and the experiences one has at work can be easily used to solve financial and social problems at home. Managing tasks and people can be learnt hands on from work, and the same can be applied at home. In this respect men will tend to be better. Yes, it is wrong how men get more opportunities outside home. But that just makes them more deserving and prolific at managing things inside the home too.

2 points

The idea behind smartphones is the unification of media like cameras, MP3 devices, file managers, web browsing abilities and, of course, telecommunication. Since when was the previous model of the iPhone, for example, not enough? Are the new features worth buying the latest phone for? I don't think so.

2 points

Generally, a child's religion is determined by the parents by default. With that model in mind, there's loads of ways to look at this:

1. "Child abuse" refers to going against the child will and forcing him/her to do something the child would not want to do. According to the model, the child's religion is decided the very moment he/she is born, and at this point the child is a little too young for this planet to imply that he/she has an opinion about something as complex as religion. So if the child has free will, parents hold the right to decide what is good and bad for the child, and it is in the proposers' interest to believe that parents will be sane enough to do the right thing.

2. Say the child grows into a 9 or 10 year old, maybe even a teenager. He/she will not have the required maturity to decipher which religion echoes his/her internal thoughts. Instead, they'll like a religion that is less demanding in terms of time and energy rather than one that defines them. I believe that a decision based on practicality and ease cannot be the best decision to make when choosing a religion, not only because the teachings of the religion and what religions stand for is more important, but also because choice of religion sends out a firm message of how somebody thinks and a carelessly chosen religion will, therefore, have detrimental effects on a person's image in society.

3. Most religions preach the same thing: to be good human beings. Yes, the ways are different. But the idea is the same. The differences in religions, therefore, are too minute for children to decipher. When they grow old, they certainly have the freedom to change their religion because that's when they have the mental maturity to understand the slight differences in the various religions.

2 points

Few facts to look at:

(A) This motion says "God", not "Jesus". Why the heck is everyone looking at it from the viewpoint of Christianity? I think collectively most religions, if not all, believe in the concept of souls being immortal. Death, therefore, is not really the end of a soul: it is only one soul exiting the body. And therefore, that makes any divine spirit (the concept of God, in this case) immortal. No death, no need for suicide.

(B) Jesus resurrected himself. The message was simple: divinity cannot be destroyed. God will always be with us no matter what. If you would call Jesus' actions "suicide", then sadly you don't get the point of Jesus doing what he did.

1 point

By doing so, we are creating a platform from which governmental systems will be able to promote LGBT rights. Changing "lady" to "person" would not only reduce gender bias but also give the same respect to the president's partner regardless of his/her sex, in turn giving the public a message that's acceptable in the 21st century: homosexuality is not wrong. Taking the US into perspective, where federal law still does not approve of LGBT rights but state laws do, we are making progress by declaring the US as a country that is open and welcome to same-sex relationships and, therefore, same-sex marriages.

SidRonCon has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here