CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS SmiggzYh

Reward Points:1
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:1
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
1 point

It was once legal, and encouraged, for men to seek girls of a young age. It is said that Romeo and Juliet was written of a 17-19 year old seeking a 13-14 year old girl. All through time, young girls, if you may, "fresh" girls (and I use that term with such discontent that I almost feared to use it) were seen as ripe fruit. Now, of course we as society have moved beyond that, but if it was in us before to engage in such activity, is it just going to go away?

There have been new studies that are pretty much conclusively proving that homosexuality is a genetic thing. It's said that it's caused by a woman being too feminine, or to clarify, being able to produce more young, being more attractive to the opposite sex. This is then passed on to the male child, and causing the boy to seek men, and be attractive to men, as the genetics would encourage.

So if homosexuality is genetic and natural, could paedophilia not be as well? I move to put forward an idea that paedophilia is sick and despised for the reason that is it thought sick and despised. How do we distinguish one from the other? Tell me, that one food you most cannot bare? Is it because you do not like it, or because it is a bad food? I would probably presume that you would not be able to confidently answer that question. So could this not be the same case? It is true that it is snapped up by the media, and projected at us at an alarming and frightening rate, thanks to the boom of the internet. And it is true that sexual offences are harming, and should be dealt with strong punishment. But what is the need to punish if we do not understand what we are punishing?

Are paedophiles truly evil? Or are they merely repressed and suffocated, told they are bad people, and they should hate themselves, causing them to strike out and do wrong. If they are doing wrong, they're going to do worse, aren't they? I'm not talking about people who are attracted to children of a young age, that's not acceptable, though if the case is that it is genetic, then they need help, not reprimanding, but I mean instead of children nearing consensual age. Teenagers. Children going through puberty, sexually active people. I don't have the answers, I'm asking for input. This topic particualrily attracts my attention, because I see this treatment of these people as persecution. A military man was given 30 years in prision, 15 in military prison, and 15 in regular, and was striken from the army, for accidentally sleeping with a 15 year old who had claimed to be 18 and made advances upon him. That man's life is ruined now. He will never be able to live life in society ever again.

I will once again make the point of damning ALL sexual offenders. Rape and harassment is wrong, regardless of the circumstances, though I do question why it happens, as a man of science. They should be dealt with by equal measure. But what of consensual relations? Is it not unfair to trap people? A girl who is 15 cannot have a relation with a man of 18, or 19, or older even, because she is below the age of consent, despite her consent? There was once a law that said gay men could not have sex until 21. So it was fine to be gay, but only when old enough. That's a sick trap.

I open the question to you now.

SmiggzYh has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here