What part of $4.5 billion do you not understand?

According to Forbes, Trump currently has a fortune of $4.5 billion. Do you have a fortune of $4.5 billion? His performance in the private sector clearly hasn't been unsuccessful, and it definitely hasn't been "shit".

Let's take a look at her foreign policy record so far.

The Iraq War

Clinton endorsed and voted for the catastrophe of the Iraq War, leaving thousands of Americans dead, trillions of American dollars wasted, without support from the UN, and with a justification that was completely wrong. As Secretary of State, Clinton proved herself completely incapable of helping to save countries such as Egypt (which were friendly to the US at the time) from being overthrown. Furthermore, the consequent Arab Uprisings were allowed to take place without Clinton intervening in the slightest... thus leading to the formation of IS.

Libya

NATO bombing for which Clinton was largely responsible meant that Gaddafi was overthrown in militants operating in the fashion of IS. As a direct consequence of this, four Americans were killed in Benghazi and today Libya is a failed state. Obama has explained that this is his "single greatest failure" as president - it is something Clinton is almost entirely responsible for.

Syria

Clinton has shown herself to be completely incapable of achieving anything here. In 2010 and 2011 Clinton made repeated promises that "Assad must go". The year is now 2016 and he is still in power.

What makes this worse is that Clinton's boast about arming militants to fight against Assad eventually resulted in those very same militants being attacked by ISIS and billions of dollars of US weaponry being seized after skirmishes in Mosul.

North Korea

No progress has been made here. North Korea has simply been allowed to develop its nuclear weapons capacity to unprecedented levels and within the next few years North Korea will have the capacity to launch a nuclear strike on the US should it wish to do so.

"She has substantial experience dealing with foreign leaders"

I suppose that what you mean by this is that Trump has no experience of dealing with anyone? You mean to say that he has no experience making deals and does not know how to conduct himself in front of foreign leaders? Well we all know that's rubbish... Trump has huge amounts of experience in the business world and has met with tycoons and leaders from all four corners of the world. Recently he met Henry Kissinger personally to discuss what steps could be made in the name of foreign policy, especially after Clinton has shown herself to simply being able to leap from one catastrophe to another.

You forgot rape

This question cannot be answered with a simple "yes" or "no" answer. Homework may be important to some people, and yet not so important to other people. I don't imagine many people in jobs that require a lot of manual labour will have found their essay-writing days at school very useful in the workplace. Nevertheless, it depends on how much someone uses what they learn in the future, which could be not at all. For some people, there are far more important things to learn in life than how to decline and conjugate French verbs.

Robots aren't intrinsically good or bad in themselves: they simply carry out the wishes of people. If the people give them good orders they can be a blessing.

It is in everyone's interests that robots should be a blessing to society. The idea that robots could think for themselves and declare war on us like in Terminator is simply ridiculous - a notion that must be dispelled.

Robots ensure that things operate far more smoothly and efficiently. They have the ability of doing millions more calculations per second than any one human could ever comprehend. What matters is that they will make our lives easier, because that's what we tell them to do.

Yes, here is the definition of a vehicle: "a thing used for transporting people or goods".

That is what a plane does.

And Clinton's campaign isn't also a joke in itself? During Clinton's role as secretary of state, what has she actually accomplished to make the world a better place?

Her "experience" is useless.

In England we have huge problems with the overpopulation of hares. If not for hunting, how would you propose to resolve this issue?

Also, guns are probably the most humane way to kill an animal. One minute the animal is alive... and then it isn't. There is no unnecessary pain and no unnecessary torture. A bad way to kill an animal would be to have a pack of dogs rip it apart. But your concern about guns being harmful? There's nothing to worry about.

There are loads of countries that don't have white majorities. Why does it matter? Unless someone is particularly racist it should make no difference to them.

It's also good to note that this wouldn't be a sudden change. The change is already happening and it's going to be very gradual - even the racists will have ample time to accommodate themselves with the changing demographics.