Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 84 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 96% |
Arguments: | 73 |
Debates: | 3 |
The things we currently do not fully understand about our universe or reality we should not come to the hasty and irrational conclusion that supernatural phenomena or supreme beings is the cause of it all. 300 years ago, before our current understanding of physics, nobody knew how the earth could have possibly formed, it was considered unfathomable and that god could have only created it. However as more evidence was obtained, and more ideas were thoroughly and rigorously studied, the attraction of objects to each other become apparent. Accretion of particles due to gravity became the ultimate of conclusion to how planets are created, all based on evidence, and the things that could be proven as fact with the evidence presented. The most notable thing that a religious person might resort to is the idea that god created the universe and the most common counter is the question of what created god before the universe was created. By all means i could argue that aliens created the universe, in a space larger than the universe by harnessing enough energy and then creating a cosmic rip in space to separate our universe from the bigger universe. As more evidence is gained and more things are proven in the absolute, it would appear that religious beliefs are a very large pot of scientific and/or rational ignorance that slowly recedes as more things begin to get discovered.
yea, i would say so, they are quite annoying, but i suppose the people who like low quality debates usually participate in them. I wouldn't make it against the rules to not be allowed to make low quality debates, they are debates after all, no matter how ridiculous they are. some debates start off as surveys that evolve into debates.
I'm a programmer, in fact i'm an all out tech guy, i can build circuit's, repair computers, build computers from scratch, build basic computers on circuit's, and do just about anything imaginable on a computer. I am basically a huge technology and computer nerd, that also has all the special skills that can be used on a computer. Plus i can make ram, processors and anything else from nothing more than bread boards and the proper components.
hmm, i wonder who could have possibly down voted this, and why?? because when i look at the argument activity it has received 2 up votes, and has 2 points total, so someone must have down voted it. Its certainly not that i'm making ludicrous statements with no reasoning at all, nor are any of my statements outrageous. This is well thought out, plus i provided an example below because when i was editing someone voted it up so i had to place my Sweden example in a second one, so if someone is going to down vote this they need to give a really good reason below.
I often find that school bullies get away with what they do, even when caught. When they do occasionally get caught they just go right back to bullying because they are clearly, and definitely not rehabilitated. So if a School bully cant seem to get it right with current punishments imposed upon him, the severe punishments should be imposed upon him, or anything else it takes to protect the victims that the bully usually goes after
one of my main goals is to invent the most magnificent devices for the 21st century of people to gaze upon, maybe even 22nd century. I want to create things that have absolutely never been created before, nor even thought of before. I already have a few schematics that i have created for some of my devices, they are very complex and i certainly would not want to explain them on here. The only thing i'm lacking now are the proper parts, so i will just have to build them, i do have electrical engineering skills and computer skills after all.
Absolutely not. A school should not decide how one should dress, that is ridiculous. The students don't get paid to dress, nor would many students actually consent to wearing a uniform if asked. People should dress how they want, not make people wear clothes they might not feel comfortable in or dislike. People should always be free to decide how they dress, unless they are getting paid to dress a certain way and/or consent to it at a workplace.
|