Ironic considering Milo is a homophobe.

I don't hate him, but he promotes a book that commands the murder of gay men. Promoting the murder of gay men(even if indirectly, and from a gay man) is homophobic.

Ironically I went through a super-christian phase when I was young. And I was actually a homophobe(in my defense, homophobia would be rational if the Bible were true).

Now, I'm the opposite of that: A bisexual anti-theist.

Promoting Christianity is inherently homophobic.

If you promote the Bible as the truth, and/or suggest following it's rules, you also promote the passage that says to slaughter gay men(Leviticus 20:13).

And if you have a counter-argument don't make me go to another website to get it, because that makes it difficult to create my rebuttal(assuming it is an invalid counter-argument).

"Tell the truth, are you homophobic?"

Specifically "Tell the truth". This implies it is likely someone would lie about their homophobia, and if that were the case, you would need them to provide evidence for their support of gays, because simply having their word would mean nothing.

I'm choosing this side for a semantic reason.

The actual acronym "LGBT" could be improved.

I think "HB+" might work.

Standing for homosexual and bisexual.

And the plus because Homosexuality and Bisexuality are the only sexual identities that i'm sure are valid.

Ex:I haven't seen evidence that asexuality is even humanly possible(without mutation or alteration), so including it in the acronym specifically might delegitimize the movement.

As well as transgender, because using that label makes a statement about the definition of gender that i'm not sure is an accurate one.

And these things apply to all of the other labels that I've seen.

He's in the right.

The constitution specifically prohibits theocracy.

All future U.S. currency should be created without "In God We Trust" on it.

However, past currency should be kept for obvious practical reasons.

Normally I'd back my position with some evidence and logic(or at least try to).

But I don't think I need to explain why the MCU is better. This debate is pretty pointless.

The left is not a unified entity. Generalizations are always bad(excluding this one).

Prove Christianity(which would prove the existence of sin), and I will gladly admit my own sin. Until I encounter evidence, I am not going to believe in the existence of sin(or Christianity for that matter).

No.

And I detest your implication that someone is homophobic until proven otherwise.

The rule is supposed to be "Innocent until proven guilty".