Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 4 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 5 |
Debates: | 0 |
๐ผ๐ก ๐ ๐ข๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ข๐ก ๐๐ ๐ด๐๐ก๐๐ ๐ก'๐ ๐๐๐ก ๐๐๐๐๐.
I know that most people that complain arenโt intending to be rudeโฆ but they end up looking that way to artists.
Questioning an artistโs motives and decisions regarding pricing is insulting to their artistic skill and belittles the fact that theyโre trying to raise money to cover their financial responsibilities.
๐ ๐ ๐๐ญ ๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ฌ๐๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฐ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ฌ๐ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฎ๐ฉ ๐๐จ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐๐ญ ๐ฅ๐๐ซ๐ ๐. ๐ ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ๐งโ๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐๐ง๐จ๐ฎ๐ ๐ก ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฎ๐ฉ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ค ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ข๐ซ ๐ฏ๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐๐ฌ, ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ, ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฏ๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ซ๐ญ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐ฌ, ๐๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฌ๐. ๐๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฌ.
I mean seriously, the artist have to explain his/her own actions and decisions that he/she have chosen for the permissions and pricing of his/her own creations.
It's better not to buy the piece of art than complain about the price, it devalues the artist's work, skill and service (also financial responsibilities)
Of course it should be protected, not allowing people to wear what they want will be quite hypocrite and fascist.
& Swastika means different things to different people.
The swastika (as a character ๅ or ๅ) has been and remains a sacred symbol of spiritual principles in Buddhism, Hinduism, and Jainism.
But since the 1930s, people think of it as a main feature of Nazi symbolism, and as a result, it has become stigmatized in the West by association with ideas of racism, hate, and mass murder which isn't correct becuz the name swastika comes from Sanskrit (Devanagari: เคธเฅเคตเคธเฅเคคเคฟเค), and denotes a "conducive to well being or auspicious"
The misinterpretation of swastika is simple hypocrisy since 20th century.
How can you even be free in a country when you can't wear whatever you want
I don't think so.
Because of my dad being in Air Force (India), I've moved around through my whole life. I've changed 5 schools.
I was born in state of Rajasthan, then moved to state of Maharashtra, Gujarat, Bihar, Assam, Goa and now New Delhi-from where I'm actually from.
Many people I meet find it unusual, but it's a normal thing for me.
No.
You're only responsible for yourself in life, not for anyone else.
Though if you can help then you should but if you just can't help, if you fear drowning yourself, can't swim or something like that then it's okay, it depends on why you didn't help.
But no, I don't think someone is responsible for someone else's death in such a case.
Harry Potter, no doubt.
Although, it's a hotly debated topic but Hunger Games is no match for Harry Potter.
The Lord Of The Rings is a much better match for harry potter, the hunger game is out of discussion.
The fantasy world of Hunger games isn't that great, the first part/book is still good but the rest are not that good.
If we talk about the movies, the cinematography, the script, the screenplay & casting of Harry Potter is a million times better than of the hunger games.
If we talk about the book, the world, the background and every single detailing & of writing of Harry Potter is way better than of the hunger games.
In the first graph below, drawn from the past twelve months of searches online, the green line is search interest in Daniel Radcliffe, star of the Harry Potter movies, of course, yellow is "Harry Potter movie", red is "Hunger Games movie" and blue is "Jennifer Lawrence".
|