CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
pic
pic
pic


Hostiles
View All
pic
pic
pic


RSS TheScarecrow

Reward Points:35
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
75%
Arguments:45
Debates:13
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
2 points

Trump touts Rasmussen poll showing 49 percent approval

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/administration/372145-trump-touts-rasmussen-poll-showing-49-percent-approval?amp

Rasmussen Poll: Trump Approval Rating at 49 Percent

Read Newsmax: Rasmussen Poll: Trump Approval Rating at 49 Percent

https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/841176/1

-1 points

In other words no rebuttal. I gladly accept your white panty flag.

-1 points

Do underwater volcanoes explain any ice melts and temperature rises in the oceans?

Maybe. But volcanoes don't change the fact that science hates you.

So an admittance of me being correct. Good.

Are we simply in a part of the climate shift where temperatures rise naturally due to the tilt changing of the Earth over time?

No.

Wild Speculation.No data to back up your claim.

If temperatures have slightly risen, is this current, mildy risen temperature, better or worse than when it was a degree cooler? Why or why not?

You're not thinking long term enough.

Tell us how long term to think. And if the climate seems fine, why would I assume it's getting worse, seeing most of the worst hurricanes on record aren't recent?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ListofdeadliestAtlantichurricanes

So stop referring to ancient civilizations and try to dispute the indisputable fact that humans are emitting gases that trap heat in the atmosphere.

Demonstrate to me that gases being trapped in the atmosphere isn't due to natural phenomenon. Then provide me data from any other time period to compare it to. Oh wait. I gave you the best data available. That data of another time period is? Cities were covered over with water not that long ago but before industrialization. Was it because "gases trapped heat in the atmosphere"?

You can't hire yourself. You must hire someone else.

2 points

The climate had nothing to with the onset of ice ages

THE NATURE OF ICE AGES

Ice ages are times when the entire Earth experiences notably colder climatic conditions

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/cause-ice-age/

The climate had nothing to with the onset of ice ages you daft bastard. Ice ages are caused by the Milankovitch cycles. Read a book for fuck's sake. You are embarrassingly stupid.

God you're an uneducated idiot.

But you didn't agree they were two separate things

I never made any claim that human caused change is the same as natural chsnge. I claim there is no human change in the first place.

Ice ages are caused by the Milankovitch cycles

Cool. How do you know which part of the cycle we are in? Is this the part where the temperature rises a mild tad like perhaps when much of Alexandria somehow wound up under the sea? Or did the ancient Egyptians cause thousands of cities to be covered by ocean waters by their emmitting carbon with their 2,000 year old automobiles?

I read it. I could easily refute its hypothesis and explanations. You can't even describe what is in them because you don't understand them. If you did, you would have explained them earlier when I asked.

One explanation for the hypothesis was sea level rising. I just pointed out many pre industrial revolution cities being deep under water.

Another explanation for the hypothesis was antarctic ice melts. I pointed out earlier that there are volcanoes under the antarctic ice.

Another explanation for the hypothesis was ice cap melts from a few decades of data concerning satelite imagery. The problem is we have no satelite imagery of any other time period in history to know if this is a normal cyclic pattern that happens every few decades or centuries or so. For all we know the slow shifts of the Earth cause this by its altered tilt, among many other factors, such as sun spots and flares.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here