- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Jesus Christ, learn some basic history FactMachine, you dopey, argumentative imbecile.
Germany’s economy was in a mess when Hitler was elected Chancellor in January 1933. Hitler and Nazi propaganda had played on the population’s fear of no hope. Unemployment peaked at 6 million during the final days of the Weimar Republic – near enough 33% of the nation’s working population. Now Hitler decreed that all should work in Nazi Germany and he constantly played on the economic miracle Nazi Germany achieved.
He decided that his entire campaign.
What are you blabbering about? Didn't I just ask you to shut up?
He want a jingoistic maniac the entire time.
You literally wrote that sentence just to use the word "jingoistic". Either accept the fact that Hitler turned the German economy around or shut up.
I did not say they directly change behavior.
Yes you did, liar. You claimed the higher the hormone level the greater the tendency toward aggression. Writing it like a pseudo-intellectual ponce instead of a normal human being doesn't get you a pass, I'm afraid. It just makes you an idiot for not understanding what you wrote.
What part of "This is oversimplified, obviously" did you not understand?
The problem with what you wrote was not that it was simple. The problem was that it was factually incorrect. Understand?
This is a debate about gay rights vs business owner rights not about paedophilia or Trump
You didn't ask him to stay on topic. You specifically told him not to call Trump a child rapist in "any of your debates", even though he is actually a child rapist.
Keep banning everybody who exposes you as a Nazi. That will definitely prove you aren't a Nazi, kid.
I didn’t say I personally was going to do any of them.
Of course not. Because they are unethical.
Your position is analogous to learning how to be the world’s greatest spy is unethical because it includes killing other spies and doing dirty stuff. That’s the job.
Your position is analogous to a retard who hasn't even read the book he is defending. This book describes murdering people in their sleep and other good old fashioned American ways to become rich and powerful. It isn't about spying. It is a book written specifically about how to lie and deceive other people for personal gain. If you don't think that is unethical then chances are you're a psychopath.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!