CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS TimelordROOK

Reward Points:94
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
97%
Arguments:89
Debates:3
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.

Yeah, great. Let's have children go to school with grenades in their backpacks. Seems legit, oh look teacher, i brought in my daddy's grenade and if i pull this ou- oh fuck, now it's not just the sick ones, it's the curious ones we've got to worry about.

As i've said before. Guns are a symbol of a human desire to KILL efficiently. It's, at it's base purpose, not a defensive item. If you want to defend yourself, get a shield.

Sure, it can be used as a weapon, but at least, you can say with conviction that it was created with the intent to defend. You can not defend a gun the same way.

Why do you think that captain america's shield was his most well known tool? He was a symbol of the DEFENSE of america. If guns were equal to defense, he's have had a Browning .30 cal instead. But no, we know him as the guy with a SHIELD.

Well, if you're just going to use guerilla tactics, why have guns? bombs can be made from basic household cleaners and they kill just as well with the added shockvalue that bombings have on the governmental state of mind anyway. No guns necessary. Actually, i'd think a backpack is a little less conspicuous than an AK-47. And you can leave the bag there, detonate the bomb and obliterate nearly all the evidence you were there in the first place.

There you go, 7.62 instead. you can go all the way up to .70 cal, if you want. Naval guns, even, it doesn't change that the most effective way to wage any kind of war on your government, should you choose to do so, will be without firearms.

TimelordROOK(94) Clarified
2 points

No, they don't. I expect, even if he did provide evidence on that point it would be a statistic of murders that are not related to religion. Not exactly proof that atheists did it, just proof that the pope didn't.

no right minded atheist uses science to refute something science can't define or measure. It's sort of like following the words of an endlessly transcribed book written thousands of years ago. Oh shit, did it just do that? yeah.. I did.

TimelordROOK(94) Clarified
1 point

I suppose that that's really a matter of perspective. It would be up to you to decide whether or not you want to be a slave.

In my personal, unbiased opinion:

Love is a chemical interaction in the brain, right? It's something that exists within consciousness for the purpose of finding a suitable mate and procreating. There would be no purpose for it otherwise.

Now, you may not be able to control who you fall in love with, falling in love with a member of the same sex points to something not functioning in the brain properly.

Nobody has the right to tell gays they don't belong here. They are humans too and I should hope that society has come to a point where segregation is unnecessary.

My only interest in homosexuality is academic. I'm interested to know why something that clearly goes against the prerequisites of evolution and nature exists. It may sound harsh, but it is not intended to insult. It is only logical.

I think, at the least, that being Bisexual gives you the utmost level of choice. Who you want to do, regardless of sexual organs. Being that free to choose is something I cannot do, I'm enslaved to my attachment to female bodies.

If you're bisexual, you're free. Either end of the spectrum, you're not.

Well, come on. You've got to admit, while not disgusting, going to hell, or mentally ill, being gay does not promote the natural necessity of procreation. That means that while not strictly unnatural, it is abnormal and to a degree, pointless.

By no means does that imply that gays do not have the right to be gay. They can be all the gay they want. It's an unbiased view on the nature of homosexuality. No procreation=No species growth=Extinction.

If everyone was gay, we all wouldn't exist.

Love the way you ignore counter arguments when representing Atheism in your false talk show. It's really cute when you try to make your opponents seem mentally deficient by putting words in their mouths.

Only proves your lack of intelligence.

So... God is the Living Force?

Wicked, where do I sign up for the Order? Always wanted a lightsaber.

Also, if God is the very essence of life, and I am alive; I am God.

Problem? ;)

Prove me wrong, if you can.

About Me


"I am a young, idealistic man who loves the thrill of a good debate."

Biographical Information
Name: Alexander Earle
Gender: Male
Age: 31
Marital Status: In a Relationship
Political Party: Other
Country: Canada
Postal Code: N4S1W8
Religion: Atheist
Education: High School

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here