See, here's the problem with that. You may believe in God, but not everyone else does. Why should we force your beliefs on them? That's taking away their freedom. By bringing religion into it you're saying "It's my way because I know my God exists." Well, there's lots of people who believe in a lot of different things as far as religion goes. Just because your particular religious beliefs forbid abortion doesn't mean anyone else of any other faith should have to abide by those same standards. It's like getting drunk. Your bible tells you not to get drunk, but Christians aren't out trying to ban alcohol. If you truly believe in the bible, you'll want people to come to your God in their own way, not by calling them murderers for having abortions. That's going to drive people away from your religion.

You completely avoided my argument and spun it to make yourself seem right again. If you cannot address my point, don't dispute it.

Now, to address your point, yeah, abortions can have unforeseen psychological and physical damages post-procedure. This is made known to the patient beforehand, they're not going in blind.

As long as that baby is in the mother and 100% dependent on her, it's not something that can be considered a separate part of her. If she dies, it dies. It's completely dependent on her, and as such, whether or not that baby is aborted should be up to the mother. Not to mention, to spin the argument on itself, if a woman is raped, she should have to endure pain and suffering for 9 months? That effectively turns the mother into the slave of the child.

This is a visual generation. The days of learning purely out of textbooks are 40-something years too late. As technology progresses, visual stimulation and interactivity become more and more necessary to not only associate newer generations with the available technology, but keep and hold their attention as well.

So if someone's raped, they should be forced to endure 9 months of pain and emotional trauma because of a situation they had no control over? That's ridiculous, and harmful. It's incredibly selfish to insinuate someone should have to endure near a year's worth of pain and suffering because of someone else's mistake.

It's incredibly short-sighted and flat out dumb to insinuate that a president winning another term will somehow kickstart the beginning of the apocalypse.