With computers, you have access to a plethora of knowledge and all you have to do is use a search engine. Also, you can find specific topics that you want to learn about faster and quickly look up references. Seriously, when was the last time you've been to the library for books?

Why not just go to a church that is affiliated with the religion that you are interested in? Can't explain that? Go figure.

Which is why people that want to learn about religion should gather outside of school in order to learn. Oh wait, that's called church.

Why don't people go to a church? Religion does not have to be part of daily life, thus it should not be in school, according to your argument.

That makes no sense. If you want to learn about religion, why don't you go to a church?

If that's the case of your belief, then you should be against this quote since you only agree with the "pawns" part.

Why take away peanuts for those that enjoy eating them? If someone allergic to peanuts decides to eat peanuts, let them die. This is called darwinism.

Have you seen a shaved wookie? Have you seen in any of the Star Wars movies where wookies have barbers? Do you think a wookie could even shave with the tools? Point made.

You're right, it would be a safer place without African Americans. Oh wait, there are other groups that commit crimes? Let's kick them out too. Hold on, Caucasians also commit crimes? Let's remove them as well. Oh wait, there's no one in America now...

As stated in my argument, juries should consider the nature of the crime. If a thirteen year old is being forced into committing murder, it is a completely different scenario as the one that is stated in my argument (a teenager premeditating murder).

For this section of your argument, you are stating that if teenagers commit "thrill" crimes which the likelihood of being caught is minimal, then why should we drop the punishment? Should we not enforce stricter punishment for those that do get caught, thereby creating an example of what would happen if you did get caught?

Not old enough to legally drink, not old enough to vote, yet old enough to be sent out to war? If you're going to compare voting to being placed into jail, explain the logic in the what I just stated.