CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
pic
pic


RSS Volker

Reward Points:91
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
88%
Arguments:87
Debates:7
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
0 points

So the one who left was bi. .

1 point

"The question is, should we make tobacco products illegal, which really is the only effective way to ban their use."

That's circular reasoning. We should ban them because that's teh only way to ban them.

1 point

No, govermnent shouldn't have the right to prevent adults from harming themselves. Government is necessary to solve conflicts between people but not to tell people how to live.

Besides, every form of drug prohibition creates a black market and a crime problem that is bigger than the problems caused by the drug itself.

0 points

WE don't know. I find it somewhat more likely taht there is no good but there is no way to be sure.

0 points

Sorry, I didn't see that. .

1 point

As long as bioth partners are old enough to consent, do consent and neither of them is cheating on a third person I don't see anything wrong with it.

2 points

Do you have any sources to back up this claim? .

1 point

It's what invaders from Essembly do. They bring their bad habits to CD, they bring their strange words to CD, they bring copied debates to CD. Essemblers are evil.

2 points

All in all it's reducing pollution more than creating it. It works well in many other countries, so why not in the US?

1 point

This is a ridiculous strawman resolve.

Most conservatives don't want to ban gay sex or strauight oral or anal sex or sex before marriage. They may find it immoral but they don't want to ban it.

There are almost no conservatives who want to ban alternative religions.

Keeping the spankinbg of children legal isn't nanny-statish at all - parents can decide themselves if they want to spank their children or not.

Having English as official language doesn't have anything to do with the nanny state.

Not allowing gay marriage doesn't have anything to do with teh nanny state either.

You can do better than that, Hadrian.

Displaying 7 most recent debates.

Tied Positions: Lesser Government vs. Lenin Stalin Palin
Winning Position: Essembly is back.
Winning Position: Legalize them.
Winning Position: He should meet the Dalai Lama
Winning Position: Read faster dammit
Tied Positions: Monopoly vs. Closed systems are bad

About Me


Biographical Information
Gender: Male
Marital Status: Married
Political Party: Independent
Country: Germany
Religion: Agnostic
Education: Masters

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here