They are not going to respond (at this point, I doubt it).

Anyway, the universe couldn't have eternally existed, and there was a beginning of time (and will be an end). (Though 'time' sort of loses any meaning...)

How do you know?

After that, the first cause argument can't really be refuted.

Its logic can be.

Not inherently the same. However, I believe society should treat them that way.

Just remember, being a biological sex is not the same as gender. They should be interlinked in my view, but are not inherently synonymous.

This list is flawed. For example, being transsexual is not a gender.

Get rid of the minimum wage. Wages can remain high because of market forces, but immigrants from low-wage countries have contributed to lower wages, and disrupt the market forces. Also, trade deals disrupt the market too, leaving it unconstrained. Luckily, we have Trump to change that.

Gender is largely a product of sex

This is because society classifies biological sex and gender identity as corresponding traits.

However, pretending that gender is entirely a social construct denies some important biological facts as well as various common differences of behavior arising from those biological differences.

Are you saying that being feminine and masculine are biological facts or is the quality of separating behavior into masculine and feminine traits into two distinct concepts a social construct?

Gender is masculine and feminine traits, gender roles, and gender identity.

That is terrible evidence for that view. The likelihood of this "SaintNow" being specifically David Wood requires more extraordinary evidence than just that they "have similar logic".

David Wood on CreateDebate? In the absence of powerful evidence, I will assume that this is not true.