CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS XenMonkey

Reward Points:2
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:2
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
2 most recent arguments.
1 point

Sorry I have to dispute you here. I see your intentions as good, but still not totally accurate.

All primates are descendant of "old world" monkeys. That includes apes and homo sapiens. So we can still be considered, in a general sense, monkeys.

Example: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v466/n7304/full/nature09094.html

I think you might be doing a minor disservice to the side of the argument that you actually support.

1 point

Why is it that people that believe in the literal interpretation of the bible can't seem to cite credible sources?

The article you cited was written not by a scientist, but by a Baptist pastor. And he wasn't even a pastor with a background in science. He is an accountant and computer technician.

Hardly credible proof and definitely misinformed.

Please cite ACTUAL scientific papers and evidence that back up your claim. It doesn't need to be from evolutionary biology. It could be from archeology, geology, or anthropology if you would like, but at least cite sources from people that actually spend their time putting in the effort to answer questions, as apposed to data mining to suit your agenda.

Besides, we would have seen evidence in ice core records. The core from Dome C, high on East Antarctica's plateau, contains snowfall from the last 740,000 years and is by far the oldest continuous climate record obtained from ice cores so far.

There was absolutely NO record of a global flood contained in the core... ever.

Also there are several other problems with a global flood idea, such as...

Why are geological eras consistent worldwide?

How was the fossil record sorted in an order that supports evolution?

How does a global flood explain angular unconformities?

When did granite batholiths form if there was a flood?

How can a single flood be responsible for such extensively detailed layering?

I could go on and on...

XenMonkey has not yet created any debates.

About Me


Biographical Information
Gender: Male
Marital Status: In a Relationship
Political Party: Other
Country: United States
Religion: Atheist

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here