CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
pic


Hostiles
View All
pic


RSS YoungPup

Reward Points:62
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
80%
Arguments:36
Debates:16
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

Got to the end finally. There's nowhere that Trump praises the invasion of Ukraine or acts like it's a good thing. He simply uses the logic that it is "savy" to wait until the left is in power and then pretend like you are there to help Ukraine knowing the left and NATO are stupid enough to fall for the shit. None of your logic helps Democrats. Objective, moderate people see what is clear and obvious. Putin invaded nothing when Trump was in power. He took whatever he wanted when Democrats were in power. Probably why the Democratic Party's poll numbers are the lowest I've seen in my lifetime as people bail from the party like rats from a sinking ship.

1 point

Now for the middle. Trump never praises the invasion of Ukraine. What he does do is mock the left for being stupid enough to fall for Putin's tricks. Declare Ukraine independent, walk in acting like you're there to help, and never leave. He knows the left are too weak and stupid to prevent him from doing what he wants. Probably why he waited until Trump was out of office to invade. If the left's narrative were true, Putin would have walked in untouched while Trump was in office, but no, he waited until Biden was in office, and we both know exactly why. He feared Trump. He didn't fear the American left.

1 point

I'll dissect the video into parts:

I love how in the beginning of the video the leftist activist posing as a comedian mocks sitting far away while we all know that the left mocks people for sitting close during a pandemic. Nice self own. If this is comedy today, Heorge Carlin is spinning in his grave. That was hard to watch as you can hear slight, hesitant fake laughter when prompted.

1 point

You do not have the right to murder anti-fascists and argue it was justified because they are fascists. No. That's stupid and it's insane.

We can blast Fascists with killer bees, and since you're Fascists, you are fair game.

0 points

and the Nazis were very much in favour of capitalism.

Not according to him, nor according to Hitler. Quote a link source that can be edited by anybody at any time according to itself again so I can laugh at you.

The fact that German anti-Semitism and anticapitalism spring from the same root is of great importance for the understanding of what has happened there, but this is rarely grasped by foreign observers.

-"The Road to Serfdom" (Written in 1944)

••••••

Wikipedia according to Wikipedia-

This page in a nutshell: Do not use a Wikipedia article as a source for another Wikipedia article, even when describing Wikipedia.

Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. Biographies of living persons, subjects that happen to be in the news, and politically or culturally contentious topics are especially vulnerable to these issues. Edits on Wikipedia that are in error may eventually be fixed. However, because Wikipedia is a volunteer-run project, it cannot monitor every contribution all the time. There are many errors that remain unnoticed for days, weeks, months, or even years. Therefore, Wikipedia should not be considered a definitive source.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia isnotareliable_source

1 point

Wikipedia according to Wikipedia-

This page in a nutshell: Do not use a Wikipedia article as a source for another Wikipedia article, even when describing Wikipedia.

Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. Biographies of living persons, subjects that happen to be in the news, and politically or culturally contentious topics are especially vulnerable to these issues. Edits on Wikipedia that are in error may eventually be fixed. However, because Wikipedia is a volunteer-run project, it cannot monitor every contribution all the time. There are many errors that remain unnoticed for days, weeks, months, or even years. Therefore, Wikipedia should not be considered a definitive source.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia isnotareliable_source

1 point

Learn to read

I did read. I just quoted you what was written at the time and not from a progressive site not accepted as an actual source by colleges and highschools. But you did didn't you you little retarded boy?

1 point

It is true, of course, that in Germany before 1933, and in Italy before 1922, communists and Nazis or Fascists clashed more frequently with each other than with other parties. They competed for the support of the same type of mind and reserved for each other the hatred of the heretic. But their practice showed how closely they are related. To both, the real enemy, the man with whom they had nothing in common and whom they could not hope to convince, is the liberal of the old type. While to the Nazi the communist, and to the communist the Nazi, and to both the socialist, are potential recruits who are made of the right timber, although they have listened to false prophets, they both know that there can be no compromise between them and those who really believe in individual freedom.

-The Road to Serfdom(Written in 1944)

0 points

The Nazis were on the far right. Right is the opposite of left. Normal people learn that by the time they are five.

Not according to books written at the time, prior to the recent left wing revisionism of history.

The fact that German anti-Semitism and anticapitalism spring from the same root is of great importance for the understanding of what has happened there, but this is rarely grasped by foreign observers.

-"The Road to Serfdom" (Written in 1944)

1 point

Why do you always label your lies, "according to Democrats"?

Because the most prominent Democrat literally said that.

Hillary Clinton questioning the legitimacy of the 2016 election is a direct threat to our democracy

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clinton-questioning-the-legitimacy-of-the-2016-election-is-a-direct-threat-to-our-democracy?_amp=true

Oh wait... I think I know.

Seeing you are really slow and don't catch on very quickly, I highly doubt it.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here