CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
pic
pic


Hostiles
View All
pic
pic


RSS Beastforever

Reward Points:511
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
97%
Arguments:694
Debates:16
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
beastforever(511) Clarified
1 point

Someone who questions everything. Someone who understands why square pegs were not meant for round holes.

A conservative could do that. The only difference is, a conservative would most likely have predefined answers.

You've made it clear that you're not a conservative. What do you consider yourself to be?

ROFLs and LMMAOOs sure won't................................

beastforever(511) Clarified
1 point

Sorry but I think #2 will describe the pro death penalties 😏

seems totally irrelevant..

Although there has been quite a debate till today about an "objective" morality of some sort, Science and morality can, in fact coexist.. While science tells you things the way they are, morality in my opinion, is objective in it's most agreeable statements, in other words, if someone would look into "morals" one can find that it all comes down to survival as a species.. we're genetically hardwired to survive, and we can draw comparisons to how groups in the wild behave and find out they too, have a certain innate sense of how to survive as a species. With all that said, while one can reach a point where you have two differing suggestions proposed by science and morality, you're the king and they're your ministers, choose to execute which best suits you.

Sure will! and you too....................................................

I think more debates on science and philosophy could make this place of value to students coming in.

I say P.E is important for the kids who aren't much into keeping themselves healthy, it might seem quite a pressure to them during the P.E hours, but it'll give them some physical exercise which in turn might even end up becoming a healthy habit to few.

1)I think the ones who can think to an extent will realize that their existence depends on the existence of a society and hence we shouldn't generally see massacres.

2)If we do have a murderer, anyone who knows so will try to eliminate the murderer just cause of the fear of being killed(not always though, but sure is a possibility) and if the person chooses to kill the murderer, would end up becoming a murderer and there is a chance this cycle could go on.

3)As of the above point, it's a possibility provided that there aren't ways to contain murderers. Which brings me to the point where people would gather around and find better ways to stay alive by doing things necessary to not let people kill anyone randomly. A suggestion could be making the murderer blind.

4)If seeing someone and killing them is also applied to people seeing through cameras, warfare just got an update.

It all comes down to what percentage of the population cares about the bigger picture of surviving as a species..

I think anyone who isn't depressed and is in a clear state of mind should have the right to choose how and when they will die.

Displaying 10 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Which is the most thought stimulating book you've read?
Winning Position: Why have people deserted this website lately?
Winning Position: Nah, It's regular bs
Winning Position: beastforever gets roasted, join in.
Winning Position: we try to change their opinion
Winning Position: what would be the present state of the world if western colonizations never took place?
Winning Position: yes

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here