Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 111 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 97% |
Arguments: | 49 |
Debates: | 15 |
The monster is unnatural. As such, can he be held to the same specific standards that a reasonable, moral and natural entity are held to. Does Victor not deserve the punishment he reaps with the creation of this monster? In destroying the balance of life generated by existence, the earth is allowed to reconcile the catastrophe. Doesn't the monster embody life's will?
Can one not argue that the monster is aware of the most appropriate action to be taken with him, as he is a created being and through his literary and observational studies? He understands and recognizes what is good or bad, and so should be able to make decisions and actions aligning with those, correct? Does a history of negativity truly excuse horrific and murderous behavior?
Is the monster not responsible for his actions to this point? If he has the capability to advance so quickly physically and mentally through his schooling as detailed in his oratory, doesn't he understand the repercussions of murder and torture?
|