If they went through all of that to keep their land, ask yourself the question, why didn't they stay? If they wanted to keep the land and settle there they would have stayed like the Palestinians and developed the country that they have worked so hard to protect. But, they left, which resulted in the Palestinians developing and settling in the country. All the Palestinians did was take advantage of a good opportunity.

I mostly agree with this statement, but I don't think using one currency and one government would be a good idea, mostly one government. If you are going to split the two groups into different areas, they are in their own state. They should be able to create whatever type of government they want, and it wouldn't make sense for two different states to have one ruler if they are different areas.

Yes, the land was given to them by God according to the Israelis, but they didn't develop the country. If they were busy defending their country and fighting wars to protect it, how would they have time to develop a stable country. Then, the Israelis left and the Palestine built Israel into what it is today, and they think that they should just be able to take over what the Palestinians built after they fleed.

I also disagree with this statement because even though the Jews did defend the land in wars, the Palestinians, after the Israelis left, developed the country into what it was before the Israelis came back and started taking over the land that the Palestinians built and settled in. Also, if you think about it, the Jews didn't have a lot of time to make a well developed and stable country if they were just fighting wars to keep the land.

That is why you would make the area of Jerusalem and Bethlem neutral so that both religions could have access to what they consider a holy place in their religion.

I agree that some places in Israel are holy places and important to the Muslims, but almost all of their holy places are in northern Israel, and those are almost always used for Jewish purposes. That is why I made the southern West Bank neutral so that both groups could access holy places that are for multiple religion, Jewish and Muslim. It is also important to give each side easy access to the neutral section so that they don't have to go through each other's countries to enter it.

I agree that the Jews have been through a lot, but the Palestinians also developed basically all of the land. I don't think it's fair for Israelis to get to leave, and then come back to a country that they didn't develop, and take over all of the land. That's like in school if you barely started a project, and then the other group member did basically all of the work, and you take full credit for having done most of it.

I also think that the Palestinians should get some of the land, more specifically, the southern part of the land. I gave the Palestinians this land because it includes the Gaza Strip, and the Muslims already occupy this area. I also gave them more land than the Israelis because a lot of their land is desert, and can't be used for agricultural purposes. Also, because the Palestinians never left, so it only seems fair for the Palestinians to get to keep more of the land that they developed and settled in then the Israelis who just came back to the country that they barely, if they did anything, helped develop.

I think that the Israelis should get most of the northern part of Israel because most Jewish holy places are in the north, and most of their population (that are Jewish) would be able to travel to these holy places without worrying about traveling through the other group's territory.