Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 13 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 4 |
Debates: | 2 |
Guys, lets be honest. We all want left because it's a different, it's exciting, it's new, it's adventurous, it's unexplored. We're so tired of using our right hands, right legs, right everything, and we don't always want what's right.
Haha, yes, unfortunately it does seem to be turning into that.
I have no doubt that you have made some good, new, valid arguments for Pro-life. And as I have only just joined, I have not had the chance to look far back at older arguments for/against abortion.
However, what I see in the newer debates (i.e. The morning after pill, emergency contraception: do you support it's use?, This is a Child in the First Days of their Life) is not rational discussion, it's bickering. Snide comments such as,
"I do. I feel if women don't want to burden themselves with a child they should be allowed to end it, at any phase = Pro-Abortion."
"His was a pro-abortion sentiment (expression) if ever there was one.
So, "Fuck you" back.
Your declaration that you are pro-abortion does not come as a surprise to me at all. Though it does make your outrage seem curious."
"This is some thing we can agree on.
Many women think it's a legal right to kill their children with abortion and people like me see it as a crime against humanity.
Frankly, I'm surprised there are not even more debates created about it."
do not strike as productive or new.
I am not saying people are not interested in it, or that it is not a vitally important topic. It would be one thing if people were presenting new arguments for the subject, but the fact is they're not.
|