Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 2 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 7 |
Debates: | 0 |
"No it was the perfect healthcare program"
No body EVER said that.
"Wanting a fully implemented Obamacare is government run healthcare"
We are the ONLY modern Nation that doesn't have "government run healthcare".
"we know the politicians in DC know the healthcare needs of all Americans."
They might not know the "healthcare needs of all Americans", but neither do traditional insurance companies or healthcare providers. That's why healthcare is and should be designed so that it is flexible enough to meet the varying needs of Americans. Which, as other nations have proven, is well within the realm of government.
I vote yes, especially the evangelical right. My argument has always been; life is sacred to them right up until the child is born, after that mother and child can eat $hit and die. They have no qualms about forcing a young mother to full term but obstruct any social safety net that would help them.
Trump won because of 70,000 votes (total) in three key states. Most people, in post election exit polls, thought he was unqualified, lacked the proper disposition and temperament and was totally unprepared to be President. He lost the popular vote buy one of the largest margins in recent history.
MAYBE you could have ran a chimpanzee and beat Mrs. Clinton, after all she was the most maligned presidential candidate ... ever. Don't think that djt's victory is a indication that the Left is that far gone. OR, go ahead ... please!
I don't think that Obamacare can be called "one of the greatest designed failures in American History". It certainly has faults, but has never been fully implemented as "designed" due to obstruction by the right and that obstruction extended to blocking ANY necessary tweaks than would be normal in ANYTHING so complicated.
This post is pure propaganda. It uses nonsensical extremes (a million dollars in a too heavy bag) to support the unsupportable argument that "Libs" will complain no matter what. Then goes on to make the unprovable claim that the left, in general, is sitting around with imagined arguments that exist only in the authors mind. Anyone that's studied propaganda techniques recognizes this post as nothing more than text book propaganda.
The last sentence is a patent example of propaganda. "A Lib"; he starts out by calling a whole class of people the demeaning contraction of Liberal. Then takes the high ground of being the adult and calls the Liberal an annoying child; I guess they are annoying for unproven slander, intimidation, shaming, etc., etc. And substantiates this by slipping in his "supposed medal of honor" by waving it like a child's teeter totter. And he can't even spell riddance. In any case he uses a lot of words to say "Libs bad me good".
We don't currently have a first "LADY", Melania is no lady. I hate to beat up on her, being married to djt she's to be pitied. But all the money in the world won't make up for her past. We've never had a centerfold as a Presidents wife before. So what do you call her the (very) first tramp?
|