CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Geekgroupie

Reward Points:31
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:26
Debates:2
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

Blue Bell sux. Haagen Daz, Ben and Jerry 's and my fav: Breyers Ice cream.

1 point

you may want to follow Michio Kaku. I don't do existential woo stuff.

1 point

IMO, atheist who argue against theists should know alittle science before posting a Too Stupid meme.

1 point

That's not the point. Atheists who argue theists and use critical thinking and logic should be able to hang on to their reasoning when out of the arena of religion. I find many don't.

1 point

All I have to do is say, "String theory is a fairy tale" and the fb atheists that respond to me go nuts. It seems the incessant demand for evidence in the arena of religion doesn't carry over to some physics stories promoted by the media. By the logic of some of my atheist opponents, I could POOF a multiverse into the logic. Maths is not evidence of maths. That's circular logic

2 points

It's not the doctor's position to reveal it to the public. There are protocols in place to investigate. There is a marketing/media department that handles issues. It would be unethical for an observed trend to be reported without applying critical thinking and epidemiological methodology to a circumstance. Question fails.

1 point

they have to act like they don't want to be caught staring. It gets creepy.

1 point

Perhaps an If By whiskey argument. If by purpose you mean, contributing to the community , then yes. Discover your gift. Give it away. IMO, if you have to ask, then no.

1 point

objective purpose: eat, drink, be merry and pain free. Survive.

1 point

objective purpose: eat, drink, be merry and pain free. Survive.

Displaying 2 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Too Stupid For Science? Try Religion

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here