Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Gheesh
| Reward Points: | 7 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
| Arguments: | 2 |
| Debates: | 1 |
Definitely yes. First of all free software (see link below) has no entry costs for any user, so everyone can have access to it. Not only consumers, but also companies benefit since any of them can develop or maintain it, it doesn't favor a particular producer.
Moreover, since the source code is always available and can be freely modified, it guarantees that the software never becomes obsolete as long as somebody uses it.
So your argument is just that it's different? Then we should definitely stick to MS-DOS, it was so user-friendly...
I've installed Linux (generally Ubuntu) for many friends already and they get used to it much faster than Windows. I've only had troubles with Windows "power users" that try to force bad habits into their new system: "What? This doesn't have a registry??"
For those who think that Windows is easy, check the link below.
|
||||||||||||||||
