Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 4 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 4 |
Debates: | 0 |
I agree with your statement because there were more females in New England which helped the men make families. With their families they were able to have a larger and more efficient population. In the end, this helped New England with their trading and economy.
New England was more successful than the Chesapeake Bay colony due to several reasons. First off, New England settlers consisted of mostly Puritans who attempted to create an ideal community enriched with religion and unity which allowed the colonists to focus on God and on their family. In contrast, Chesapeake colonists were “gentlemen” who did not hunt for their own food which resulted in many lives lost. Next, New England developed little cities and towns, helping it become more economical than Chesapeake Bay, which was beneficial for their trading.
In my opinion, New England was more successful than the Chesapeake Bay colonies. For example, the settlers that arrived at New England tended to arrive as families while the colonists of Chesapeake Bay consisted more of men. The women in the New England colonies had more freedom and since there was a higher ratio of men to women, in the Chesapeake Bay colonies, it was more difficult for the men to start families, which resulted in having a higher death rate.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |