CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Goelriddh4

Reward Points:5
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:6
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
6 most recent arguments.
1 point

Drugs have an adverse affect on the society.Some drugs are very addictive and If one is under their influence can not only harm themselves but also the people around.

In the law it is mentioned that you have the right to do anything to your bodies but the government has the right to stop you if that affects others.Instead of leagalizing drugs,effoerts should be made to improvise treatment facalities.

1 point

Let me first tell you the meaning of imperialism.Imperialism is an action that involves a country extending its power by the acquisition of territories. (Wikipedia version).You argued that the invasion of Afghanistan,Libya,and Iraq is imperialism.

Afghanistan-The War in Afghanistan followed the 2001 United States invasion of Afghanistan.The U.S. was supported initially by Canada and the United Kingdom and later by a coalition of over 40 countries, including all NATO members, under a United Nations mandate. The war's public aims were to dismantle al-Qaeda and to deny it a safe base of operations in Afghanistan by removing the Taliban from power.

Libya-On 19 March 2011, NATO-led a multi state coalition which began a military intervention in Libya, to implement United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973. The United Nations Intent and Voting was to have "an immediate ceasefire in Libya, including an end to the current attacks against civilians, which it said might constitute crimes against humanity"

Iraq-According to U.S. President George W. Bush and UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, the coalition mission was "to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people." Others place a much greater emphasis on the impact of the September 11 attacks, and the role this played in changing U.S. strategic calculations, and the rise of the freedom agenda.The trigger was Iraq's failure to take a "final opportunity" to disarm itself of alleged nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons that U.S. and British officials called an immediate and intolerable threat to world peace.

1 point

Very well put up argument.Great job.Can you plz give evidence of any one such incident where the alchol or tobacco companies used dirty tricks to stop drugs from becoming legal?

1 point

During the time of the Pacific War,Japan was under the dictatorship of Mussolini who had dreamed of making Japan a world superpower.

Japan initiated a war on Manchuria, followed by, China and finally on pearl harbor.It was the one initiating the war for its own glorification.U.S.A. was neutral and not a part of WW2 until the Pearl Harbor attack.Thus, in my opinion Japan was majorly responsible for the Pacific war.

1 point

The U.S.A. and the USSR were both a world superpower at some point of history but there has been one thing I like about U.S.A. that it adopted anti-imperialism after American revolution.

During the time of colonialism ,America forced England to free many of its colonies.

If given a chance , I would like to live in U.S.

1 point

It is true that UK had easier trade as a part of the EU but there are quiet a few valid reasons for U.K. To leave-

U.K. charges billions of pounds a year in membership fees.

There is too much red tape.The government is not completely free to take decisions .

Immigration freedom is affecting U.K. badly.

If it leaves EU then it is possible that it would reinvent itself as a super charged economy -like Singapore.

This was my opinion why U.K. should have stayed in the EU.

Goelriddh4 has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here