You don't make any kind of sense whatsoever.

You say that "no one knows the truth". That's a contradicting statement.

So you're telling me that you absolutely and truthfully know that "no one knows the truth"???

You also say that its arrogant to say that God exists?? Atheism is a minority in comparison to the entire world! You guys are a small bunch but yet you know the the truth? Now how arrogant can you possibly get??

Spoonerism, you're an idiot.

Oh I forgot to mention why your oscillating theory doesn't work.

#1. Its unsupported by science and any objective evidence. No evidence, just wishful thinking.

#2. The scientific community almost dismissed that idea so now there looking for another theory ( ie: quantum cosmology theory and string theory) to evade that creation theory.

#3. in order for the universe to contract it would have to be dense enough to generate sufficient gravity that would eventually slow its expansion to a halt and then with increasing rapidity contract it. But estimates have shown that the universe is far below the density needed even when you include luminous matter and dark matter. Its dependent on critical mass which is not met so the universe will probably expand forever. The universe is also accelerating

#4. The reason that the universe would not "bounce" if it were to contract is that the universe is extremely inefficient (entropic). In fact, the universe is so inefficient that the bounce resulting from the collapse of the universe would be only 0.00000001% of the original Big Bang (see table above). Such a small "bounce" would result in an almost immediate re-collapse of the universe into one giant black hole for the rest of eternity.

Guth, A.H. and M. Sher. 1983. The impossibility of a bouncing universe. Nature 302: 505-506.

#5. there are no known physics that could reverse a contracting universe and make it bounce before it hits singularity.

#6. You forgot one important thing. It wasn't just mass and space that were created but linear time was also created during the Big Bang so no other universe could have existed prior to ours. The only way that would be possible is if this supposed fictitious universe was operating from another dimension of time.

The Nature of Space and Time, Hawking stated, "Today virtually everyone agrees that the universe and time itself had a beginning at the Big Bang."5

Hawking, S.W. and Penrose, R. 1996. The Nature of Space and Time, p. 20.

Nice attempt though but like I said, that was dumb as fuck

Super dimensions huh? what fuckin evidence are you getting this from retard?..give me one evidence for multi dimensions...just one! You must know some unknown, Nobel peace prize winning shit that scientist aren't aware about. The only thing that is in another dimension is your head.

what physics indicates the oscillating theory? There are no known science that proves that. I am bringing up facts based on what up-to-date science reveals to us so far, what science leads us to discover, and you bring up some dumb shit from your head with zero evidence. It's make-believe irrational bullshit and you actually believe that its absolutely true with ZERO, NADA, evidence supporting it!! I find it tolerable and more reasonable to say "we don't know" then to actually make shit up. Get that cut and paste wacko-pedia shit out of here. Dude, you're funny...instead of the Big Bang theory you believe its the Big Bang Bang Bang Bang theory...kinda like your mom, dumbass.

How can you say that the universe is infinite? Infinite is conceptual and abstract. Can you fit "infinite" books in a finite bookshelf, retard?? You got to be on some drugs to believe that. How can you use "infinite" to depict a natural world?

Its now good science vs. your retarded make believe bullshit

And who said we were talking about evolution?

Science insinuates that only intelligence produces intelligence 100% of the time ALL the time. That is 100% consistent, 100% observable, 100% testable and I'm sad to say that also includes you.

So where is the evidence that says that non-intelligence produces intelligence? You got to be looking through some distorted lens.

I see what you're trying to do here :P

You're using non-scientific reasoning to postulate your own theories and label it a fact. (I call the bullshit flag on that one)

You're so transparent. I find it amusing how you're selective: you use science as the groundwork to support your claim and then you fill the rest with pathetic unorthodox science mixed with delusional BS outside the parameters of science...

Now that was dumb as fuck..It seems as evolution completely forgot about you...go back in your mom's basement and play some video games...

It depends on which part...in regards to cosmology, yes.

#1.

The belief that nothing created everything is pretty retarded. Anyone, religious or non-religious, that believes that is insane. I don't care what ivy university you graduated from its still insane to believe that.

Believing in a "talking snake" is less stupid than the belief that "nothing eventually created the humans who wrote about that talking snake"

#2.

A lot of atheist tend to side with science. Scientific method is based on observation, testing, and retesting. No one observed the universe being created, we can't test it, and we will never be able to test it so now a scientific explanation is rendered useless and it now demands a philosophical explanation. However, science presupposes logic and philosophy. It's not a matter of science vs. religion, its a matter of good science vs. bad science.

#3.

Also science points out that the universe, consisting of time, space, and matter was created meaning that the natural laws in science we use were created.

We CAN NOT use a natural explanation to explain its own origin if nature wasn't even created yet so we must go outside the domain of the natural that is not bounded by time, matter, and space. That now requires a super-natural explanation.

#4. We know the infallible truth that non-intelligence CAN NOT create intelligence. Only intelligence can create intelligence and an intelligent product is a sign of intelligence. That's pretty #$%&ing;stupid to believe otherwise. That contradicts reasoning itself. Now here is a double edge sword: If atheist considers themselves intelligent then obviously that potential was created from an intelligent agent. However if they believe that a non-intelligent source started it all, then why should they believe what their brain, the most intelligent organ, tells them at all????

#5.

Furthermore, the big bang started it all. The big bang is an explosion but as we have scientifically observed, tested, and retested, we know that explosions, bangs, and chaos DO NOT produce design, order, and complexity. That is 100% factual and consistent in our natural universe. To say it does is pretty stupid.

#6.

Last but not least, atheist will substitute what they do not know with "chance" as the cause. That is illogical. In "this" natural dimension there is always a cause for everything. Chance is not a cause. We might have a 50/50 chance for heads or tails in a coin but nonetheless it still had a cause. Objectively that "cause" was due to several variables: me willingly moving my hands with a certain amount of force and from friction. So chance is never is a cause. Chance is what rocks dream.

Other than that..that's about it