Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Joecavalry
| Reward Points: | 36410 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 89% |
| Arguments: | 22441 |
| Debates: | 3647 |
No it can't!
An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. ;)
Instead of thinking about seeing a point on a wave, think of it as being able to measure the force of the wave. A tsunami carries a lot of force. This is viewed as mass. If there are no waves, there is no force. There is no mass. When we "shoot electrons" at the double slit (in the double slit experiment) we are shooting a wave of the electron field (an electron wave).
Think of a wave pool in a water park. A wall moves forward, compressing the water field and thus creates a wave. When we "shoot electrons" we are compressing the electron field and creating an electron wave. This wave then passes through both slits and the resultant waves interfere with each other thus creating the pattern viewed in the double slit experiment.
Simple ;)
Everything is a field. There are different fields but they interact. The interaction give the particles mass.
Think of us detecting mass as us seeing a point on a wave. Now think of air and water as fields. If there is no wind, there are no points because there are no waves on a lake. We cannot detect a particle with mass. But if we excite the air, it interacts with the water creating waves and we can focus on a specific point on a wave. We detect a particle with mass.
That's the best I can do ;)
I read it once, I was not going to read it a second time. ;)
You could have Googled it.
TLDR = Too long. Didn't read.
But what I meant to say was that I was not going to read it a second time. ;)
Nom is a virus hacking the universe? I think you give him too much credit ;)
That explains nothing. If God was the light, did He create Himself (Let there be Me. Achoo. Bless Me, Me.)? If He/light already existed, why would He need to create it? ;)
On the first day, God created light. Does that mean He created the subatomic particles called photons? Because at that point in time there was nothing to emit light (neither sun nor stars. They were created in day 4) and nothing to reflect light. And photons have spin so they can change state. Ergo, God created a quantum computer and now we are creating our own (or hacking His). We are hacking the universe in order to make it do computations for us. I hope He installed antivirus software! ;)
|
||||||||||||||||||
