- New Activity
- Most Heated
- Most Recent
- Most Arguments
- Most Votes
- Debate Research
- My Debates
- My Waterfall
- Public Waterfall
- Newest Recruits
- Most Persuasive
- Most Provocative
- Most Outspoken
- Most Creative
- Alphabetically
- My Allies
- My Enemies
- My Hostiles
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
| Reward Points: | 89 |
Efficiency: ![]() | 83% |
| Arguments: | 155 |
| Debates: | 2 |
Whether religion is right or wrong, by banning religion you are forcing people to believe that their is only one right answer. That goes against every core of the modern world. If we start saying that then we are no different than the 3rd world countries that forbid practice of any other religion than their own. Or worse, we are comparable to CHINA!
The advantage to using a term such as "civil union" is that you eliminate the word marriage from the legal system. This word is used in churches and you need to seperate church from state. Therefore, if a church tries to say they are against gay marriage, the answer is simply marriage is not recognized in state. You are free to practice marriage in your churches. It is very important that with a civil union, both straight and gay couples be granted ALL of the same rights though.
Just because something is protected under the constitution does not mean it should be funded. It simply means, we should not restrict it.
...in your own, heavily-biased opinion that is.
Really? And what proof do you have that abortions have some growing need??
Thats true. We do have the right to stand up and object to things we do not agree with. The debate is, should the government pay for abortions. Not some technicality about how we can't choose where all the money goes. Paying for an optional procedure from tax dollars is a waste and unnecessary. End of story.
I liked your argument so much that I decided to use it as a debate. I hope you don't mind.
Im only pushing for rights.
Nothing is perfect.
If the girl is overage & dirt poor then that will STILL use your tax money.
Infact enforcing your fascist law will also cost tax money.
If those teens go to prison they will be using your tax money to keep them in there.
Stop trying to push your beliefs on everyone.
There is lots of other stuff wasting tax money.
Also what if the girl gives the baby up for adoption?
Also what if the kids parents approve of them having sex?
should it still be illegal?
so adults are perfect & nothing can possibly go wrong when they have sex?
I have friends that have had sex & theyre okay.
There is nothing wrong with sex. Get over it anti-sexual.
Well problem is how are you going to get the police to arest me for that?
Also another question is: what if the minors DONT get pregnant? then how does that hurt you?
So you think I should be arrested for being unattractive & telling you what you are?
So what. Our tax money is being wasted on alot of shit that I couldnt name. Also what if a poor woman gets pregnant? isnt that just as bad?
What are you going to do to all underage fornicators?
Just leave them alone & live & let live.
How about you make all sexuality illegal?
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
|
About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate BlogTake a Tour Help/FAQ Newsletter Archive |
Sharing Tools
Invite Your FriendsBookmarklets Partner Buttons RSS & XML Feeds |
Reach Out
AdvertiseContact Us Report Abuse |
Basic Stuff
User AgreementPrivacy Policy Sitemap Creative Commons |