With modern day technology and print media, the content people put online and the actions people commit have been increasingly easier to access by the public. The 'private lives' that all of us would like to have online has become more and more public. This would be even more apparent if one is a public figure. The eyes of the public are constantly crave for gossips and small talk of public figures, and are often too interested in the private lives of them. As a result, these public figures have become eyeballed by the undying curiosity of the public. These public figures are eyeballed so tightly that even the actions or mistakes they make in private are sometimes exposed and publicized. Them, as still being humans, should be held accountable for their actions and mistakes, whether committed in public or in private. For example, sportsman Michael Phelps has been taking drugs and doping in private, but yet still participating in public swim events. As a sportsman and human, he should not be doing so as it does not have integrity and goes against the sportsman's code, although done in private. Hence, public figures should be held accountable for their actions, be it made in private or in public.

Yes, i agree junk food is bad for your health, BUT. People, even students do have the rights as a human to choose what they want to eat, so others like principals do not have the right to control what the students eat.

This side would win cause ORANGE FTW! :D Though blue is nice too.

Someone who does not consider the effects of something is someone who is stupid.

But even if they put an immediate end to the war, did they consider what was the damage done? What would happen to the reputation of USA as the "arsenal of the democracy"?

Who would? its like asking someone to punch you directly in the face.

"the Americans did not take into consideration or ignored the the effect going to effect the innocent citizens who were driven by propaganda to back the Japanese government." Yes, the war is between the militia and the militia ONLY.

I would think that Martial Arts does not teach you must self defense, UNLESS its hand to hand combat, and both parties do not have any weapons of any sort. However, most people would be armed, so it is quite useless to be learning hand to hand martial arts if against a trained person with a weapon. Moreover, with the invention of guns, martial arts as self defense has become even more useless.

President Henry Truman dropped 2 atomic bombs on Japan during the world war 2. I would think that he should not have done so, due to the following reasons:

By dropping the atomic bomb, innocent civilians were hurt and killed, which should not have been the case in a war, as it is defined as an armed conflict. Civilians did not have arms to defend themselves, hence the American's cannot call this part of the war, but massacre.

The Japanese were not given a fair warning. Never did they expect the US army to have such a powerful weapon of mass destruction like an atomic bomb.

The Japanese would surrender sooner or later even if the bomb was not dropped, due to the lack of resources to continue waging this war.

The US army had just discovered this new lethal weapon, and were overly excited on using it and testing out its effects on real life people, not just air. Hence, they used to atomic bomb even if there was not a great need to,