Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 2 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 88% |
Arguments: | 2 |
Debates: | 0 |
I think that rather than launching a preemptive strike we should try to take a more subtle approach. If we were to launch a strike, we would be putting millions of lives at stake and be putting our allies in a bad position to get attacked. I think that we should use the bilateral negotiation tactic to try and ease some of the tension with North Korea.
Lawson Holden (1)
I think the first option is the best one. The longer we leave North Korea alone, the more time we give them to build up the nuclear weaponry. I think it would be best to destroy their most dangerous weapons. At any moment, I believe that North Korea can strike and we need to beat them to it.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |