Closing Sentence:

Nearly two-thirds of Americans support the new full-body security-screening machines at the country's airports, as most say they put higher priority on combating terrorism than protecting personal privacy. T.S.A. screening can save you life. . Go pro T.S.A. for a safer community and environment. Better safe than sorry.

According to the Transportation Security Administration, less than 3 percent of travelers receive the pat-downs.

But Napolitano said the TSA would "listen to concerns. Of course we will make adjustments or changes when called upon, but not changes or adjustments that will affect the basic operational capability that we need to have to make sure that air travel remains safe."

One possibility that could generate public support is the use of profiling at airports, where the TSA would single out specific passengers for extra screening based on available information. Overall, 70 percent of Americans back the idea, which has been floated as an alternative.

The T.S.A machines are lssening the amount of drugs being smuggled and weapons they arent uselles. When stopping these few people is still a pro.

Everything sometimes has their flaws, your phone, computers sometimes mighgt not be working and its not americas foult.

We also asked the Johns Hopkins University of Applied Physics Laboratory to perform an independent radiation safety engineering assessment of our Advanced Imaging Backscatter Technology and they determined that the radiation dose to scanned individuals from this general use system is within the requirements of ANSI N43.17 2002 and 2009.

From the ACR article: "An airline passenger flying cross-country is exposed to more radiation from the flight than from screening by one of these devices. The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement (NCRP) has reported that a traveler would need to experience 100 backscatter scans per year to reach what they classify as a Negligible Individual Dose. The American College of Radiology (ACR) agrees with this conclusion. By these measurements, a traveler would require more than 1,000 such scans in a year to reach the effective dose equal to one standard chest x-ray."

In response to overwhelming complaint from human rights organizations and individual passengers about the exposing images that each scan creates, manufacturers are adding Automated Target Recognition (ATR) software to their scanners. This software allows for greater privacy and efficiency. A generic outline of the human body (same for both males and females) appears on the computer screen. If the scanner detects an irregularity, it will mark the location on the image and the TSA agent can further investigate. If the scanner does not detect an irregularity, then the computer screen flashes a green screen with the word “OK” and the passenger is then free to pass. ATR eliminates the need for a second TSA agent to analyze images in a separate room.

-Weapons and drugs are being hidden in various ways to be brought into the country and many are being seized in airports, TSA officers also find inert items that look very real. The problem with these types of items is that we don’t know if they are real, toys or replicas until we call out the explosive experts. Inert items can lead to disruption, closed terminals and checkpoints, which often result in canceled or delayed flights.

Should TSA be permitted to use advanced technology. yes they should. Every year 2,000 weapons are found with T.S.A screening in an airport. 111,961 kg of drugs found in the USA in 2014. People are being smuggled for example, an eight-year old boy, was being smuggled in a suitcase across the Spanish border. We have to prevent terrorist attacks by using T.S.A. screening since terrorist attacks have increased 61% in the year 2013 to 2014. The world is becoming a dangerous place. We need to take certain safety precautions, even if it might seem inconvenient.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVlU9Maa_MY&feature;=youtu.be