I am pro euthanasia of stray animals if other means such as education has not had the desired effect. Stray animals carry disease and can therefor be harmful for the population. In those cases putting stray animals done will improve safety/ Next to that euthaniasing stray animals will keep their numbers done and prevent potentilly a plague of stray animals.

The phone themselves are smart and are getting smarter with every update and new release. However they do not make people smarter. They can be used as a tool to look up information fast and where ever you are but that will only make us lazier not smarter. With the rise of smartphone people rely less and less on their own knowledge and quickly look things up online.

I agree that as long as you know what you are doing it doesn't matter if you pay a 100 euro or just 15-20 a month. The devices placed in these gyms still need to live up to standards set by the government so they are not unsafe.

I agree, the information obtained by the government can be used to create safety and fight e.g. terrorism. Bcking up the other arguments that if you have nothing to hide it doesn't matter that your information is monitored since the informtion will be useless to them.

Yes there is a future left for print media, a smaller future but a future. In my opinion magazines and newspapers will dissappear but books will stay for sure! I love reading a paper book and eventhough I can read them on my tablet I will never trade it. And I believe I am not the only one thinking like that.

Every child is different and has different needs, also when it comes to education. With the help of e.g. ipads the learning method can be adapted and fitted to the needs of every child. A smart kid will learn faster and a someone les bright will get a bit more attention/time needed. So in my opinion this development is a positive one that can only benefit children.

These small ads won't get the entire message across because there is simply not enough time. But they will help people boost the brand awareness and will therefor be succesfull for the company.

Wow difficult topic to answer. In some way easy to answer because ofcourse it is very wrong to pollute this town and with that endanger the lives of these inhabitants. But on the other side this gas can provide a greener and more sustainable future at a lower cost. And like we all know if America wants it it will happen one way or another. Is it not in Romania it'll be in another country were it will cause the same problems.

I agree that the big companies polluting our earth should be the ones fixing it. But we all know being sustainable is not high on the list of a lot of those companies. Next to that it will mean that the consumers of these companies will in the end pay more. A big part of these consumers will find cheaper alternatives. Alternatives that are probably made by smaller non-sustainable companies. Completely solving the environmental crisis is a long way ahead. In my opinion every business (from small and local to big and international, governments and consumers need to work together to fight the environmental crisis.

I agree with the others that online privacy does not exist. If you decide to go online on your computer or smartphone you give away certain information about yourself. Even though we think we can control who sees your information and especially who doesn't see your information that is not true. I just read a book about this subject and it shocked me. I thought my settings for Facebook etc. were very private but via small updates Facebook can change them agin without you knowing. So no it doesn't exist, but if you are aware of that and you are not doing anything wrong, what is the harm?