Yes, but it does have an effect, but I'm not sure if it has a very negative effect. For some people, texting is a way to have awkward conversations without being embarassed of being on the phone or being, pretty muhc being in the conversation at that exact point of time. Texting is way to have a conversation without being completely being there to immediately hear & understand the other person's response.

The most adverse effect I would give texting beside its offending way of spelling certain words and it's pointless acronyms, is that texting has made people very dependent on not being able to have a real, meaningful conversation in the moment; we are weak when it comes to dealing with a situation at hand right there in that minute.

No one is exactly the same, so what classifications in a person seem suspicious? And who decides what is suspicious? Is it a person morals, alibis, or religious backgrounds that decide if they are “not normal” enough to be treated like a regular human being? I would love to live in a safe and sound world where the government takes drastic measures to ensure the safety, but who is going to discriminate against what? I don’t believe suspicions define a person. Many different people are worried by many other people or the things they do, but no one has the right to quarantine an individual on a hunch.