You are completely right of course, and as soon as I posted it I realized someone would say something to that effect. I think that cut-off would be at the point the embryo begins to develop specific features: eyes, mouth, specific arms and legs, etc. Just realized I accidentally posted the same thing twice... my bad.

You are completely right of course, and as soon as I posted it I realized someone would say something to that effect. I think that cut-off would be at the point the embryo begins to develop specific features: eyes, mouth, specific arms and legs, etc.

No, they should not. Their religion is their own personal belief, which will most likely not influence you or anyone else in a negative way. If their religion does influence you in negative way though, (9/11 is an example of this) you should not judge the entire group following the religion, just the ones that committed the crime.

Yes it should be legal, within the first time frame of the pregnancy, the embryonic stage. Once the embryo first develops into a "baby", when it is no longer embryonic, abortion is not right. Under certain circumstances though, this condition might be avoided, like if the woman is underage, or was raped.

Religion is a person's personal choice. If you want to be a Christian, you are because thats what you believe. If you are a Jew, you are because thats what you believe. It's the same for any other religion.

Does anyone else have any right to make laws based on the belief of a specific group, leaving out the rest? Or do they even have the right (or the ability) to control what you believe? No.

What is so bad about homosexuality? If two consenting people decide to do something in private, is that any of our business?