Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 21 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 21 |
Debates: | 0 |
Snatch. (2000)
Million Dollar Baby (2004)
Scarface (1983)
Casino (1995)
Mulholland Dr. (2001)
American History X (1998)
American Beauty (1999)
Now, if the unhealthy things stop selling, I'm going to go with the healthier choice that does sell. This is very basic stuff here. People that don't like what's being sold have the option of not buying.
some film in 3D, but others only 2D Everything I needed to know I learned in Kindergarten ;)
Not really an issue though, all the big fast food companies have those menus anyways, so that they don't look bad. And they know that there is money in healthy eating these days.
The Shawshank Redemption
Pulp Fiction
Cidade de Deus
Se7en
Forrest Gump
Léon
Kill Bill
Only Google. It's the best search engine in the world. Only Google
Instead what they're doing is painting a target on the back of the people on that list. It's only a matter of time before these lists start leading to the deaths of the people on them.
If the government thinks it needs to put someone onto that registry, then it's obvious that they need to extend sentencing times rather than hound people after they've served their time and received their punishment. Instead what they're doing is painting a target on the back of the people on that list. It's only a matter of time before these lists start leading to the deaths of the people on them.
If the government thinks it needs to put someone onto that registry, then it's obvious that they need to extend sentencing times rather than hound people after they've served their time and received their punishment. Instead what they're doing is painting a target on the back of the people on that list. It's only a matter of time before these lists start leading to the deaths of the people on them.
If the government thinks it needs to put someone onto that registry, then it's obvious that they need to extend sentencing times rather than hound people after they've served their time and received their punishment. Instead what they're doing is painting a target on the back of the people on that list. It's only a matter of time before these lists start leading to the deaths of the people on them.
|