I am a Christian and I eat kosher...............stupid 50 character maximum

For me, at least the existence of objective moral values and the existence of non physical things is evidence enough that we are not merely chemical accidents, but i would also need irrefutable evidence to change my belief system.

If there was irrefutable evidence that was directly contradicting my worldview, i would examine it and accept the truth, whatever it was.

No, considering the triunity of god it is translated as singular God, a plural one if you will, here is an example:

Deuteronomy 6:4

Hear o Israel, The Lord is our God, The Lord is one, Blessed be the name of his glorious kingdom for all eternity.

Now lets look at this in hebrew:

Shema Yisrael, Adonai Eloheinu, Adonai Echad, Baruch Shem kvode alchuto la-olam va-ed.

The hebrew for one is echad, a plural one, such as a cluster of graped or a branch full of leaves, a singular one is yechad.

Facts would convince me. If you can provide me with HARD evidence of anything other than judaism/christianity, than i will see no reason to believe it. But until i see hard eveidence, creation and God makes the most sense.

In the beggining was the word (Jesus) and the Word was with God and the Word was God, he existed in the beggining with God.

We see here, in John 1:1 that Jesus is with God and he IS God. The word Elohim is reffering to the trinity. Also when esed with singular verbs and nouns elohim is a singular noun.

NONE of the variations among the translations affect important doctrines, plus we have very old manuscripts such as the deas sea scrolls, so their is no reason to believe that out modern Bible is any different than the original.

Science does not have a basis for these rules. Sorry if i have a problem with that.

This is a faulty argumet from you only taking the last senrance of my argument. Read and digest all of it.

Humanism, worship of self, the belief in man as the final authority, is essentially a religion and crutch in and of itself.