- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
'First of all God was never a man before He became God.'
Then my question isn't directed at you. The question is meant for people who do believe God was a man. You didn't answer the question, only questioned the premise of it. The whole point of the question was to make those who do believe God was a man to second guess their beliefs. As though this silly question reflects my beliefs... lol. Are you illiterate or that blinded by desperation to get your message out? For the record I do believe in God, and am offended that you assumed otherwise.
If Srom wasn't so pathetic.. what you are doing now might seem noble. I've been on this site longer than most of you, and I dont think I've seen anything as pathetic as Srom lying about his account. And no, I can't prove that it's his account, and I am admittedly a twat. But Mors is probably Srom under a different guise. No explanation is required, it's pretty plain.
It can come from both sources. For example:
I know that after an odd number will come an even number. I have not counted every number, though I understand the way numbers progress, and can deduce (by reason) that this is so. Or I can say, from experience, that you and I are typing in the English language. Though, none of these pieces of knowledge are purely rational or empirical.