CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic


Enemies
View All
pic


Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Pizzakitty

Reward Points:37
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
97%
Arguments:31
Debates:4
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

Please stop quoting out of context: it is a form of lying, and, as you put it, a dishonest debate gets us nowhere.

1 point

It's in CNN, you mean. A liberal news source. Who can you trust? Both sides are screaming "FAKE NEWS!" at the top of their lungs.

1 point

It's not even possible to be a "liberal-leaning centrist", the definition of centrist is that you do not take a side.

1 point

"The conservatives are against free thought" says the group boasting violent protesters just to keep us from speaking our different ideas; says the group that wants to arrest us for "hate crimes" that are actually a matter of opinion. No, science is liberal because it is not open to any school of thought besides that of the liberals.

1 point

Science is not a left wing study, the people running it are just left wingers. In order to be scientists, they get a degree from a left wing university (you can tell because all the protests are on different campuses, which also happen to provide "safe spaces").

1 point

Trump could not have leaked confidential information as he did not have access to it before the election. Making deals with them was not a crime because during the election he was a private citizen. He was no friend of the Russians as you can see from the worst U.S.- Russia relations since the Cuban Missile Crisis. As for him destroying unity and care for fellow Americans, that is also incorrect. People like the protesters are destroying unity with their left wing ideas getting more and more radical by the minute and immigrants with allegiances to different countries. If you were talking about the Affordable Care Act when you said "care for fellow Americans", that is just a method of getting votes. Immigrants come in, get free health care, and therefore vote for the people who support it. Health care would be great if there was no free immigration, or vise versa. He is not a tragedy, he is the greatest success since Ronald Regan.

1 point

I have also found that even when I present evidence right under the noses of Atheists, they turn it down. I also present some evidence that they usually just say is a jumbled up mix of nonsense but here we go...

The second law of thermodynamics says that when energy changes from one form to another form, or matter moves freely, entropy (disorder) increases. Apply that to your chemical soup, and you find that when all your chemicals are mixing together, they get more random instead of orderly.

Who's hoping for miracles, again?

In case you were thinking of the Infinite Monkey Theorem, let's calculate the chances of that. There is 1/26 of a chance that the monkeys will get the first letter right. Then there is 1/(26*26) chance they will get the second letter right, or twenty six to the second power. With every character going up one exponent, then it ends up 1/26 to the power of 3695990 of a chance. Some chromosomes have about two hundred million nucleotides. The chance of that coming from nothing is (because there are four types of nucleotides) 1/(4 to the power of 200000000) That's not to mention the second law of thermodynamics or the fact that nucleotides do not form by themselves. All of this put together would quite literally bring the probability down to nothing. Oh, and I just wanted to show you the numbers just so you could get the picture. In the link there are some scientists who agree with me.

Supporting Evidence: Royal Society Verdict (www.evolutionnews.org)
1 point

This does not relate to the argument. Why does it have two points???

1 point

This is a difficult topic...

If he did not let all these things happen (all these things, by the way, are the devil's doing, not his), the everyone would know he existed. If everyone knew he was real, the choice to follow him would not be theirs, because they would just choose him in order not to go to hell. The choice would be to obvious, and we would not really choose him of our free will. He does not want to wreck the dignity he gave us through free will and intelligence.

1 point

God is real, life would not be possible without him. The second law of thermodynamics says that when energy changes from one form to another form, or matter moves freely, entropy (disorder) increases. Apply that to your chemical soup, and you find that when all your chemicals are mixing together, they get more random instead of orderly.

Who's hoping for miracles, again?

In case you were thinking of the Infinite Monkey Theorem, let's calculate the chances of that. There is 1/26 of a chance that the monkeys will get the first letter right. Then there is 1/(26*26) chance they will get the second letter right, or twenty six to the second power. With every character going up one exponent, then it ends up 1/(26 to the power of 3695990) of a chance. Some chromosomes have about two hundred million nucleotides. The chance of that coming from nothing is (because there are four types of nucleotides) 1/(4 to the power 200000000) That's not to mention the second law of thermodynamics or the fact that nucleotides do not form by themselves. All of this put together would quite literally bring the probability down to nothing. Oh, and I just wanted to show you the numbers just so you could get the picture. There are some scientists who agree with me in the link.

Supporting Evidence: Royal Society Verdict (www.evolutionnews.org)
Displaying 4 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Unresolved
Winning Position: No, and keep on teaching it

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here