CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
pic


RSS Qv23alsrtini

Reward Points:2
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
86%
Arguments:5
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
5 most recent arguments.
1 point

I agree if the citizens are being feed fake information. This cause them to become violent towards the us.

1 point

though the united states has the power to defend our self north Korea is still a threat. This is because they are like a land mine ready to explode at any time. This country and its leader are completely unpredictable. Along with this the have powerful weapons including one that could take out 90% of the us population

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/defense/326094-how-north-korea-could-kill-up-to- 90-percent-of-americans-at-any

1 point

That's true but the future is just as important and if we keep focusing on the past then we wont know when history is about to repeat itself. We will be to focused on the history that has a chance of repeating it self when it already is right now.Also if the permanent members ability to veto could completely stop conflict then their wouldn't be any wars or disagreements and if anything it has more of a chance of causing it. That is why their needs to be a Chang to fit the world now. history should not decide the future.

1 point

Wait but your augment contradicts its self why did you explain the reasons its bad and then contour to say it is good.

1 point

Thought the overall power of the WWII whiners has worked well the world has progressed, and at this point any and every time there is a UN meeting the opinion of each person has become mostly predictable. It now seems even more difficult to make an important and serious choice even if it the right one. For example, let's just say a county is at war and they want to support and help but one of the permanent members dislikes that country and is at war with them. They could veto their request and easily cause damage to the county. So allowing them to veto is allowing conflict and bias opinions make the decision which is an unreliable and unfair way to resolve important issues occurring.This is why I think the majority should get to decide and if its equal then allow someone to veto as long as they don't have a bias opinion.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2015/sep/23/un-security-council-failing-70-years

Qv23alsrtini has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here