Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Roadley14
| Reward Points: | 1 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
| Arguments: | 1 |
| Debates: | 0 |
With ease, Britain could do it themselves, yes this is a bias view but we could win a war by forcing there entire population into further poverty by simply cutting trade. The commonwealth of nations currently trade with China with more than 80% of Chinas trade coming from commonwealth nations.
Not only that, NATO would proberbly back a founding member such as Britain (So, Ireland, USA, France, Germany, Iceland ect) would all cease trade leaving Russia and North Korea only to trade with China.
USA have control over South Korea (sorry special friendship) so would give attacking forces a fantastic attacking position over the Chinese.
Although how true the above is, it is very unlikely that anyone will go to war with them as they are forever changing to a more accepting and less like a dictatorship, famously lifting some of there technology blocks recently.
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
